e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2007
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number: 001-33609
SUCAMPO PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-3929237
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
|
|
|
4520 East-West Highway,
Suite 300
Bethesda, MD 20814
|
|
(301) 961-3400
|
(Address of principal executive
offices, including zip code)
|
|
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. Please see definition of accelerated and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated
Filer o Accelerated
Filer o
Non-Accelerated
Filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 21, 2007, there were 15,538,518 shares of the
registrants class A common stock outstanding and
26,191,050 shares of the registrants class B common
stock outstanding.
Sucampo
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Index
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7,635
|
|
|
$
|
22,481
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
29,375
|
|
|
|
29,399
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
42,477
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
86,565
|
|
|
|
59,949
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Deferred tax assets
noncurrent, net
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
Deposits and other assets
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
89,091
|
|
|
$
|
67,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,089
|
|
|
$
|
2,391
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,884
|
|
|
|
5,410
|
|
Deferred revenue current
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
11,517
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
related parties
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
21,089
|
|
|
|
19,326
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current
portion
|
|
|
8,909
|
|
|
|
9,192
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
30,168
|
|
|
|
28,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000 shares authorized;
3,780 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007
(unaudited) and December 31, 2006
|
|
|
20,288
|
|
|
|
20,288
|
|
Class A Common Stock,
$0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized;
8,799,385 shares issued and outstanding at June 30,
2007 (unaudited) and December 31, 2006
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Class B Common Stock,
$0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized;
26,191,050 shares issued and outstanding at June 30,
2007 (unaudited) and December 31, 2006
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
47,626
|
|
|
|
41,555
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(8,966
|
)
|
|
|
(23,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
58,923
|
|
|
|
38,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
89,091
|
|
|
$
|
67,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
1
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development revenue
|
|
$
|
38,087
|
|
|
$
|
9,700
|
|
|
$
|
47,453
|
|
|
$
|
32,141
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Collaboration revenues
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Contract revenue
related parties
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Product royalty revenue
|
|
|
9,562
|
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
|
|
11,871
|
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
Co-promotion revenue
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
48,934
|
|
|
|
15,432
|
|
|
|
61,895
|
|
|
|
39,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
7,348
|
|
|
|
3,424
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
9,545
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
13,802
|
|
|
|
5,233
|
|
|
|
16,635
|
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
|
|
6,957
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
Milestone royalties
related parties
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
Product royalties
related parties
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,075
|
|
|
|
12,681
|
|
|
|
40,497
|
|
|
|
23,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
20,859
|
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
|
|
21,398
|
|
|
|
15,633
|
|
Non-operating income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating income, net
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
21,372
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
22,229
|
|
|
|
16,782
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(7,489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,829
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,883
|
|
|
$
|
3,475
|
|
|
$
|
14,400
|
|
|
$
|
16,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share (Note 4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding basic
|
|
|
34,990
|
|
|
|
34,939
|
|
|
|
34,990
|
|
|
|
33,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding diluted
|
|
|
35,505
|
|
|
|
35,256
|
|
|
|
35,505
|
|
|
|
34,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,883
|
|
|
$
|
3,475
|
|
|
$
|
14,400
|
|
|
$
|
16,782
|
|
Other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
13,782
|
|
|
$
|
3,292
|
|
|
$
|
14,319
|
|
|
$
|
16,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
2
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
3,780
|
|
|
$
|
20,288
|
|
|
|
8,799,385
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
|
26,191,050
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
41,555
|
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,366
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,533
|
|
Stock-based compensation
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
Foreign currency translation
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
Net income (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
(unaudited)
|
|
|
3,780
|
|
|
$
|
20,288
|
|
|
|
8,799,385
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
|
26,191,050
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
47,626
|
|
|
$
|
(375
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,966
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
14,400
|
|
|
$
|
16,782
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
4,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(38,911
|
)
|
|
|
(6,167
|
)
|
Deposits and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(921
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
Income taxes payable and
receivable, net
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
(3,146
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(11,234
|
)
|
|
|
(12,458
|
)
|
Other liabilities
related parties
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(1,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(12,824
|
)
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in restricted cash
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale and
maturities of short-term investments
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(1,321
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net of
offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,896
|
|
Payments of capitalized IPO costs
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
(1,324
|
)
|
Issuance of notes
payable related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Payments on notes
payable related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
19,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,846
|
)
|
|
|
18,238
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
22,481
|
|
|
|
17,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period
|
|
$
|
7,635
|
|
|
$
|
35,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax payments made
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of
non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized IPO costs included in
accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
|
1.
|
Business
Organization and Basis of Presentation
|
Description
of the Business
Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SPI), was incorporated in the
State of Delaware on December 5, 1996 and is headquartered
in Bethesda, Maryland. On May 23, 2006, SPIs Board of
Directors approved a transaction to have SPI acquire the capital
stock of its affiliated European and Asian operating companies,
Sucampo Pharma Europe, Ltd. (SPE) and Sucampo Pharma, Ltd.
(SPL). On September 28, 2006, SPI completed this
reorganization transaction and acquired the capital stock of SPE
and SPL. The reorganization was accounted for as a merger of
companies under common control, and accounted for at historical
cost as of the earliest period presented. Hereinafter, SPI, SPE
and SPL are referred to collectively as the Company.
The financial information of these three entities is presented
in these condensed consolidated financial statements. The
Company is an emerging pharmaceutical company focused on the
discovery, development and commercialization of proprietary
drugs based on prostone technology.
The Company is a member of a group of affiliated companies
(Affiliates) in which the Companys founders and
controlling stockholders own directly or indirectly the majority
holdings. Currently, one of the Companys founders is a
member of some of the Affiliates Boards and serves as the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientific Officer of the
Company (see Note 9).
In January 2006, the Company received marketing approval from
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its first
product,
AMITIZA®
(lubiprostone), to treat chronic idiopathic constipation
(Constipation) in adults. Commercialization of AMITIZA began in
April 2006 throughout the United States.
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements and should be read in conjunction with the
Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2006 included in the
Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
as amended (Registration
No. 333-135133),
which was declared effective by the SEC on August 2, 2007.
The financial information as of June 30, 2007 and for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30,
2006 is unaudited. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments or
accruals, considered necessary for a fair statement of the
results of these interim periods have been included. The results
of the Companys operations for any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
any other interim period or for a full fiscal year.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of SPI and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
significant inter-company balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
Initial
Public Offering
In August 2007, the Company consummated its initial public
offering, consisting of 3,125,000 shares of class A
common stock sold by the Company and 625,000 shares sold by a
stockholder of the Company, at a public offering price of $11.50
per share, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of
approximately $28.4 million (after deducting payment of
underwriters discounts, commissions, and expenses of the
offering). In connection with the initial public offering, the
Company implemented an 8.5-to-one stock split of the
Companys common stock in the form of a stock dividend.
This stock dividend was effective July 12, 2007. All
historical common stock and per share common stock information
has been retroactively restated to reflect this stock split.
Preferred stock information has not been changed except to
reflect the modification of the conversion ratio to 850-to-one,
after giving effect to this stock split. In connection with this
stock split, the Company amended its certificate of
5
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of
class A common stock to 75,000,000 and the authorized
number of shares of class B common stock to 75,000,000.
Upon consummation of the initial public offering, all shares of
the Companys series A Preferred Stock were converted
into an aggregate of 3,213,000 shares of class A
common stock.
Capital
Resources
The Company has a limited operating history and its expected
activities will necessitate significant uses of working capital
throughout 2007 and beyond. The Companys capital
requirements will depend on many factors, including the
successful sales of AMITIZA, research and development efforts to
develop new products, payments received under contractual
agreements with other parties, the status of competitive
products and market acceptance of the Companys new
products by physicians and patients. The Company plans to
continue financing operations in part with cash received from
its initial public offering and from its joint collaboration and
license agreement and the supplemental agreement entered into
with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (Takeda) (see
Note 10).
|
|
2.
|
Restatement
of Previously Issued Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
The Company has restated its previously issued condensed
consolidated financial statements and related footnotes for the
six months ended June 30, 2006, as set forth in these
condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company has
restated its condensed consolidated financial statements to
correct an error in accounting for the revenue recognition of
the collaboration and license agreements with Takeda. All
amounts in these condensed consolidated financial statements
have been updated to reflect this restatement.
Description
of Errors
The Company identified an error at its operating company in the
United States. This error originated in the fourth quarter of
2004 and continued throughout 2005 and part of 2006. The
identification of this error occurred as a result of the Company
evaluating its assumptions under Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF)
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables
(EITF 00-21),
in accounting for arrangements with multiple deliverables that
require significant judgment and estimates.
The Company reassessed whether each of its required deliverables
under the
16-year
joint collaboration and license agreement with Takeda (Takeda
Agreement), which was executed in October 2004, had value to
Takeda on a stand-alone basis and whether there is objective and
reliable evidence of the fair value of each of those
deliverables. This reassessment determined that the previous
assessment of a single unit of accounting for the deliverables
under the Takeda Agreement was not appropriate. In addition, the
Company determined that the substantive milestone method was not
appropriate to account for the cash payments received from
Takeda related to the Company completing these required
deliverables and a time-based model would be more appropriate to
account for such cash payments from Takeda. Accordingly, in the
restated condensed consolidated financial statements for the six
months ended June 30, 2006, the Company reduced the
milestone revenue and increased research and development
revenue. As a result, total revenues increased by approximately
$4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
6
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The following table presents the effects of the restatement
adjustments on the affected line items in the previously
reported condensed consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30,
2006. The restatement adjustments did not affect the overall
cash (used in) provided by operating, investing or financing
activities or the effect of exchange rates on cash and cash
equivalents in the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows for six months ended June 30, 2006.
Impact on
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive
Income Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Restatement
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
Milestone revenue
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development revenue
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
25,291
|
|
|
|
32,141
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Co-promotion revenue
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
34,693
|
|
|
|
4,907
|
|
|
|
39,600
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
3,808
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
10,856
|
|
|
|
4,777
|
|
|
|
15,633
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
12,005
|
|
|
|
4,777
|
|
|
|
16,782
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
12,005
|
|
|
|
4,777
|
|
|
|
16,782
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
11,817
|
|
|
|
4,777
|
|
|
|
16,594
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For the purpose of the condensed consolidated balance sheets and
statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include all highly
liquid investments with an original maturity date or remaining
maturity date at time of purchase of three months or less.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted cash consists of approximately $218,000 and $213,000
at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively,
of cash securing a letter of credit related to the
Companys new headquarters lease agreement dated
December 18, 2006 (see Note 7). This letter of credit
renews automatically each year and is required until the lease
expires on February 15, 2017.
Short-term
Investments
Short-term investments consist entirely of auction rate
securities and a money market account. The Companys
investments in these securities are classified as
available-for-sale securities under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
(SFAS 115). Although the auction rate securities have
variable interest rates which typically reset every 7 to
35 days, they have long-term contractual maturities,
spanning from September 1, 2024 to April 1, 2040,
which is why they are not classified as cash equivalents. These
investments are classified within current assets because the
Company has the
7
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
ability and the intent to liquidate these securities if needed
within a short-term time period. These available-for-sale
securities are accounted for at fair market value and unrealized
gains and losses on these securities, if any, are included in
accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders
equity. Interest and dividend income is recorded when earned and
included in interest income. Premiums and discounts, if any, on
short-term investments are amortized or accreted to maturity and
included in interest income. The Company uses the specific
identification method in computing realized gains and losses on
sale of short-term investments.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial
instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, approximate their fair values
due to their short maturities.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts receivable include amounts due under the joint
collaboration and licensing agreement with Takeda (see
Note 10). The Company did not record an allowance for
doubtful accounts at June 30, 2007 or at December 31,
2006 because it believes that its accounts receivable are fully
collectible and it does not have a history of credit losses or
write-offs of its accounts receivable.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and consist of
computer and office machines, furniture and fixtures and
leasehold improvements. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
respective assets. Computer and office machines are depreciated
over four years and furniture and fixtures are depreciated over
seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the
shorter of five years or the life of the lease. Significant
additions and improvements are capitalized. Expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are charged to earnings as incurred.
When assets are sold or retired, the related cost and
accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective
accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in earnings.
Prepaid
Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets include capitalized
costs incurred for the Companys initial public offering,
which was recorded as a current asset because the initial public
offering was completed within twelve months from June 30,
2007. As of June 30, 2007, the Company had incurred
capitalized costs of $4.0 million associated with its
initial public offering. Upon completion of the initial public
offering, the capitalized initial public offering costs will be
reclassified to Additional paid-in capital to offset
the proceeds from the initial public offering.
As of December 31, 2006, the capitalized costs of
$3.1 million associated with the Companys initial
public offering, which was recorded as a current asset because
the initial public offering was completed within twelve months
from June 30, 2007, were classified as deposits and other
assets. At December 31, 2006, the Company was uncertain of
when the initial public offering would be completed.
Revenue
Recognition
Collaboration
and License Agreements
The Companys primary sources of revenue include up-front
payments, development milestone payments, reimbursements of
development and co-promotion costs and royalties. The Company
recognizes revenue from these sources in accordance with Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, Revenue
Recognition (SAB 104), EITF
No. 99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an
Agent
(EITF 99-19),
and EITF
No. 00-21.
The application of
EITF 00-21
requires subjective analysis and requires management to make
estimates
8
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
and assumptions about whether deliverables within
multiple-element arrangements are separate units of accounting
and to determine the fair value to be allocated to each unit of
accounting.
The Companys deliverables under the Takeda Agreement and
the supplemental agreement, which was executed in February 2006,
(Supplemental Agreement), including the related rights and
obligations, contractual cash flows and performance periods, are
more fully described in Note 10.
The Takeda Agreement provides for the following key funding
streams: an up-front payment, product development milestone
payments, reimbursements of development costs and product
royalty payments. The cash flows associated with the individual
units of accounting from the Takeda Agreement are recognized as
revenue using a time-based model. Under this model, cash flow
streams related to each unit of accounting are recognized as
revenue over the estimated performance period. Upon receipt of
cash payments, revenue is recognized to the extent the
accumulated service time, if any, has occurred. The remainder is
deferred and recognized as revenue ratably over the remaining
estimated performance period. A change in the period of time
expected to complete the deliverable is accounted for as a
change in estimate on a prospective basis. Revenue is limited to
amounts that are nonrefundable and that Takeda is contractually
obligated to pay to the Company.
Based on the guidance of
EITF 99-19,
the Company has determined that it is acting as a principal
under the Takeda Agreement and, as such, records these amounts
as collaboration revenue and research and development revenue.
Royalties from licensees are based on third-party sales of
licensed products and are recorded on the accrual basis when
earned in accordance with contractual terms when third-party
results are reliably measurable, collectability is reasonably
assured and all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
Because of the lack of historical data regarding sales returns,
royalty payments related to the portion of sales by Takeda that
are subject to a right of return are not reported as revenue
until the period of right of return lapses.
Reimbursements of co-promotion costs for the Companys
sales force efforts and reimbursements of miscellaneous
marketing costs under the Supplemental Agreement are recognized
as revenue as the related costs are incurred and Takeda becomes
contractually obligated to pay the amounts. Based on the
guidance of
EITF 99-19,
the Company has determined that it is acting as a principal as
it relates to these activities under the Supplemental Agreement
and, as such, records reimbursements of these amounts as
co-promotion revenue.
Deferred
Revenue
Consistent with the Companys policy on revenue
recognition, deferred revenue represents cash received in
advance for licensing fees, consulting, research and development
contracts and related cost sharing and supply agreements. Such
payments are reflected as deferred revenue until revenue can be
recognized under the Companys revenue recognition policy.
Deferred revenue is classified as current if management believes
the Company will be able to recognize the deferred amount as
revenue within 12 months of the balance sheet date. At
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, total deferred
revenue was approximately $9.5 million and
$20.7 million, respectively.
Total deferred revenue consists of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred revenue-current
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
$
|
11,517
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current
portion
|
|
|
8,909
|
|
|
|
9,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,487
|
|
|
$
|
20,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and Development Expenses
Research and development costs are expensed in the period in
which they are incurred and include the expenses to third
parties who conduct research and development activities pursuant
to development and consulting agreements on behalf of the
Company. Costs related to the acquisition of intellectual
property are expensed as
9
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
incurred since the underlying technology associated with such
acquisitions were made in connection with the Companys
research and development efforts and the technology is unproven
and had not received regulatory approval at its early stage of
development. Milestone payments due under agreements with
third-party contract research organizations (CROs) are accrued
when it is deemed probable that the milestone event will be
achieved.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative costs are expensed as incurred and
consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for
personnel serving executive, finance, accounting, information
technology and human resource functions. Other costs include
facility costs and professional fees for legal and accounting
services.
Reimbursement of the Companys safety costs is recorded as
a reduction of safety expenses and is included in general and
administrative expenses. The Company has determined, in
accordance with
EITF 99-19,
that it is acting as an agent in this arrangement and, as such,
records reimbursements of these expenses on a net basis,
offsetting the underlying expenses.
Selling
and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses are expensed as incurred and
consist primarily of salaries and related costs for personnel,
sales force fees and certain marketing expenditures.
Milestone
Royalties Related Parties
Milestone royalties related parties are expensed as
incurred immediately when the related milestone payments are due
from Takeda. The milestone royalty is 5% of milestone payments
received under any sublicensing agreements for AMITIZA. In
addition, for each indication for AMITIZA for which there is
regulatory approval, the Company must pay a
$250,000 milestone. The milestone royalties are to be paid
to Sucampo AG (SAG), (Switzerland), affiliated through common
ownership. The Company expensed $1.5 million in royalties
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and did not incur
such expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2006.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the
Company expensed $1.5 million and $1.25 million in
royalties, respectively. The Company has recorded a
corresponding liability of $1.5 million and $0 as
Accrued expenses as of June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively.
Product
Royalties Related Parties
Product royalties related parties represent the
Companys obligation to SAG for 3.2% of net sales for
AMITIZA and are expensed as incurred. The Company expensed
approximately $1.7 million and $1.0 million in product
royalties for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, the Company expensed approximately $2.1 million
and $1.0 million in product royalties, respectively. The
Company has recorded a corresponding liability of approximately
$1.7 million and $361,000 as Accrued expenses
as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively.
Employee
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation
expenses in accordance with the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R), which requires the
measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
share-based payments made to employees and directors be based on
estimated fair values.
As employee stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is based upon
awards expected to ultimately vest, it has been reduced for
estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be
estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates.
10
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The Company recognizes employee stock-based compensation expense
under SFAS 123R for its fixed awards with pro-rata vesting
based on a straight-line basis.
The employee stock-based compensation expense under
SFAS 123R recorded in the Companys condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
for three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
Founders stock-based awards
(Note 8)
|
|
|
6,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative out-of-period adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock-based compensation
expense included in operating expenses
|
|
$
|
6,225
|
|
|
$
|
2,654
|
|
|
$
|
6,071
|
|
|
$
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded a cumulative out-of-period adjustment of
approximately $358,000 during the six months ended June 30,
2007 to reduce an overstatement of additional paid-in capital
and general and administrative expenses that had been recorded
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 in
connection with certain employee stock options awarded in 2006.
The error resulted from applying the incorrect contractual term
for certain employee stock options. The impacts of this
adjustment were not material to the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, for the
corresponding interim periods or for the period in which it was
recorded, as the adjustment consisted of insignificant amounts
related to each of the quarterly reporting periods dating back
to the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method
in accordance with provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109),
which requires companies to account for deferred income taxes
using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and
liability method, current income tax provision or benefit is the
amount of income taxes expected to be payable or refundable for
the current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is
recognized for future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and tax credits and loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Tax rate
changes are reflected in income during the period such changes
are enacted. Changes in ownership may limit the amount of net
operating loss carryforwards that can be utilized in the future
to offset taxable income.
The Company accounts for its interim tax provision using
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting (APB 28).
Under APB 28, the interim tax provision is calculated based
on the Companys projected annual effective tax rate.
Accounting
for the Uncertainty of Income Taxes
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN)
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet
before being recognized in the financial statements and provides
guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition issues. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have an
impact on the Companys financial statements.
11
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The Company conducts business in the U.S., Japan and the United
Kingdom and is subject to those jurisdictions. As a result of
its business activities, the Company files tax returns that are
subject to examination by the respective federal, state, local
and foreign tax authorities. For income tax returns filed by the
Company, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal,
state and local, or foreign income tax examination by tax
authorities for years before 2003, although carryforward tax
attributes that were generated prior to 2003 may still be
adjusted upon examination by tax authorities if they either have
been or will be utilized. The Company has not received any
communications by taxing authorities that cause it to believe it
is currently under examination by the tax authorities in any of
the jurisdictions in which it operates.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to
unrecognized tax benefits as a component of tax expense. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007, there have been
no interest and penalties accrued.
Certain
Risks, Concentrations and Uncertainties
The Companys product candidates under development require
approval from the FDA or other international regulatory agencies
prior to commercial sales. For those product candidates that
have not been approved by the FDA, there can be no assurance the
products will receive the necessary approval. If the Company is
denied approval or approval is delayed, it may have a material
adverse impact on the Company.
The Companys product is concentrated in a rapidly
changing, highly competitive market, which is characterized by
advances in scientific discovery, changes in customer
requirements, evolving regulatory requirements and industry
standards. Any failure by the Company to anticipate or to
respond adequately to scientific developments in its industry,
changes in customer requirements or changes in regulatory
requirements or industry standards, or any significant delays in
the development or introduction of products or services could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys business,
operating results and future cash flows.
Revenues from one unrelated party, Takeda, accounted for 100%,
99%, 100% and 100% of the Companys total revenues for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Accounts
receivable from one unrelated party, Takeda, accounted for
$42.3 million (99%) and $2.7 million (75%) of the
Companys accounts receivable at June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively.
Segment
Information
Management has determined that the Company has three reportable
segments, which are based on its method of internal reporting,
which disaggregates its business by geographical location. The
Companys reportable segments are the United States, Europe
and Japan (see Note 13).
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB Staff issued FASB Statement
No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159),
which provides entities with the opportunity to measure certain
financial instruments at fair value. The Company will be
required to adopt SFAS 159 for the year beginning
January 1, 2008. The Company is assessing SFAS 159 and
its impact on the Companys future consolidated financial
statements.
12
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF
No. 07-3,
Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods
or Services to Be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities
(EITF 07-3),
which provides guidance to research and development companies on
how to account for the nonrefundable portion of an advance
payment made for research and development activities. The
Company will be required to adopt
EITF 07-3
for the year beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company
is currently assessing
EITF 07-3
and does not expect a material impact on its future condensed
consolidated financial statements upon its adoption.
Historical
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by
the sum of the weighted average class A and B common shares
outstanding. Diluted net income per share is computed by
dividing net income by the weighted average common shares and
potential dilutive common shares outstanding.
Computation
of Earnings per Share
The computation of historical net income per share for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,883
|
|
|
$
|
3,475
|
|
|
$
|
14,400
|
|
|
$
|
16,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average class A and
B common shares outstanding
|
|
|
34,990
|
|
|
|
34,939
|
|
|
|
34,990
|
|
|
|
33,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,883
|
|
|
$
|
3,475
|
|
|
$
|
14,400
|
|
|
$
|
16,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average class A and
B common shares outstanding for diluted net income per share
|
|
|
34,990
|
|
|
|
34,939
|
|
|
|
34,990
|
|
|
|
33,761
|
|
Assumed exercise of stock options
under the treasury stock method
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,505
|
|
|
|
35,256
|
|
|
|
35,505
|
|
|
|
34,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The potentially dilutive securities used in the calculations of
diluted historical net income per share for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
3,780
|
|
|
|
3,780
|
|
|
|
3,780
|
|
|
|
3,780
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
640,900
|
|
|
|
1,067,660
|
|
|
|
640,900
|
|
|
|
1,067,660
|
|
Non-employee stock options
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
13
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consists of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer and office machines
|
|
$
|
868
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,621
|
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $36,000 and $18,000,
respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 was $60,000 and $34,000, respectively.
Accrued expenses consist of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs
|
|
$
|
3,789
|
|
|
$
|
2,460
|
|
Selling and marketing costs
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
Employee compensation
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
Legal service fees
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
Royalty liability
related party
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,884
|
|
|
$
|
5,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Leases
The Company leases office space in the United States, United
Kingdom and Japan under operating leases through 2017. The
leases require the Company to make certain non-cancelable lease
payments until expiration. Total future minimum lease payments
under operating leases are $10.3 million as of
June 30, 2007.
Rent expense for all operating leases was approximately $297,000
and $134,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively, and approximately $464,000 and $266,000 for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Research
and Development Costs
The Company routinely enters into several agreements with
third-party CROs to oversee clinical research and development
studies provided on an outsourced basis. The Company is not
generally contractually obligated to pay the CRO if the service
or reports are not provided. Total future estimated costs under
these agreements as of June 30, 2007 are $3.9 million.
14
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Other
Liabilities Related Parties
|
On June 19, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the
Companys Board of Directors authorized a one-time stock
and cash award to each of the Companys founders. These
awards were granted on June 29, 2007 when the founders
agreed to their terms, but were not to be settled until the
earlier of the completion of the initial public offering or
December 31, 2007. In August 2007, the awards were settled
upon the completion of the initial public offering. The
Compensation Committee intended for these awards to compensate
the founders for the lost value of stock options that had been
granted to them in 2001 and 2002 and had been understood by them
to have ten-year terms, but which had expired in 2006 and early
2007 as a result of the terms of the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
The expired options would have entitled the founders to purchase
an aggregate of 578,000 shares of class A common stock
at a price of $0.21 per share and 136,000 shares at a price
of $2.95 per share. These awards were fully vested at the grant
date.
Upon the completion of the initial public offering, these stock
and cash awards had an aggregate value equal to the difference
between the value of the shares that could have been purchased
under each of the expired options, determined on the basis of
the public offering price per share of $11.50 in the initial
public offering, and the respective aggregate exercise prices
for such shares as provided in the option agreements.
These awards consisted of a combination of cash and shares of
class A common stock. Of the aggregate value of each award,
40% was payable in cash and 60% in stock. For purposes of
determining the number of shares of class A common stock to
be issued in connection with each award, the stock was valued on
the basis of the public offering price per share in the initial
public offering.
The estimated fair value of these awards was based on using the
Black-Scholes pricing model, as allowed under SFAS 123R,
totaling $10.2 million on grant date. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded
$10.2 million of general and administrative expense for
these awards, of which $4.1 million was recorded as
Other liabilities related parties for
the cash settlement portion and $6.1 million as
Additional paid-in capital for the stock settlement
portion. The liability portion of the awards will be adjusted
based upon the final cash settlement amount, but the equity
portion is fixed upon the grant date.
When the initial public offering was completed subsequent to
June 30, 2007, the awards were settled and
401,133 shares of class A common stock were issued to
the founders. In addition, the Company recorded an adjustment to
finalize the liability portion of the awards to reduce the
liability to $3.1 million, which will be the amount paid to
the founders.
|
|
9.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
On March 7, 2003, the Company entered into an exclusive
supply agreement with R-Tech Ueno, Ltd. (RTU), affiliated
through common ownership. The agreement grants RTU the exclusive
right to manufacture and supply RUG-015, a prostone compound,
and lubiprostone, and in consideration for such right RTU agreed
to pay the Company as follows: $1.0 million upon execution
of the agreement, $2.0 million upon commencement of a first
Phase II lubiprostone trial, $3.0 million upon
commencement of a first Phase II RUG-015 trial and
$2.0 million upon commencement of the earlier of a second
Phase II or a first Phase III RUG-015 trial. Upon
execution of the agreement, the Company had already commenced
Phase II clinical trials for RUG-015 and lubiprostone,
which resulted in an immediate payment of
$6.0 million $1.0 million for the
agreement execution, $2.0 million for the commencement of
the first Phase II lubiprostone trial, and
$3.0 million for the commencement of the first
phase II RUG-015 trial. The Company evaluated the
$6.0 million in cash receipts from RTU and determined the
payments were made for the exclusive right to supply inventory
to the Company and determined that the amounts should be
deferred until commercialization of the drugs begins since this
is the point at which the underlying services would commence.
Management also was unable to adequately assign value between
the two compounds based on the information available to the
Company and determined that the full $6.0 million deferred
amount would be
15
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
amortized over the contractual life of the relationship which
was equivalent to the estimated commercialization periods of
both RUG-015 and lubiprostone (estimated to be through December
2020).
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company ceased
the development of RUG-015 due to less than satisfactory
Phase II results and the Companys Board of Directors
approved the Companys decision to discontinue the
development of
RUG-015. In
addition to the Companys Board of Directors, RTU also
formally approved the abandonment of
RUG-015,
which was a requirement in the supply agreement terms. Because
the Company was unable to assign value to the compounds at the
time the agreement was executed and the $6.0 million was
received from RTU, the full $6.0 million remained deferred
at the abandonment of RUG-015.
The abandonment of
RUG-015
changed the amortization period of the $6.0 million
deferred revenue to the commercialization period of lubiprostone
(AMITIZA), which began April 2006. The Company has recognized
revenue of approximately $105,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 and approximately $209,000 and
$105,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, which is recorded as contract revenue
related party.
On June 24, 2005, the Company entered into a
20-year
exclusive manufacturing and supply agreement with RTU,
affiliated through common ownership. The agreement grants RTU
the exclusive right to manufacture and supply lubiprostone for
clinical and commercial supplies within Europe. In consideration
of the exclusive rights, RTU paid the Company $2.0 million
prior to the execution of the agreement on March 31, 2005.
Management has determined that the amount should be deferred
until such time as the commercial benefit to RTU can be
realized. As lubiprostone has not been approved within Europe,
the $2.0 million has been recorded as non-current deferred
revenue as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
16
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Collaboration
and License Agreements
|
The following table summarizes the cash streams and related
revenue recognition under the Takeda Agreement and the
Supplemental Agreement, which are described in more detail below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Received
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the
|
|
|
for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Deferred at
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Deferred at
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration
revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-front payment associated with
our obligation to participate in joint committees with Takeda
|
|
$
|
2,058
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-front payment
remainder
|
|
$
|
1,977
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,977
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Development milestones
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement of research and
development expenses
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
9,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,951
|
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$
|
47,453
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
|
Receivable at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable at
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Product royalty
revenue
|
|
$
|
2,029
|
|
|
$
|
4,339
|
|
|
$
|
11,871
|
|
|
$
|
9,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-promotion revenue
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
2,229
|
|
|
$
|
2,267
|
|
|
$
|
746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development milestone
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
*
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement of research and
development expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,387
|
|
|
$
|
6,367
|
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
On June 29, 2007, the Company
submitted a supplement to its existing NDA for AMITIZA to the
FDA seeking marketing approval for AMITIZA for the treatment of
irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. As a result of this
filing, Takeda is required by the terms of the collaboration
agreement to make a $30.0 million milestone payment. The
Company recognized the entire amount of this payment as research
and development revenue in the quarter ended June 30, 2007
in accordance with its revenue policy discussed under the
caption Revenue Recognition (see Note 3).
|
On October 29, 2004, the Company entered into the Takeda
Agreement to exclusively co-develop, commercialize and sell
products that contain lubiprostone for gastroenterology
indications in the United States and Canada. Payments to the
Company under the Takeda Agreement include a non-refundable
up-front payment, non-refundable development and commercial
milestone payments, reimbursement of certain development and
co-promotion costs and royalties.
|
|
|
|
|
The Company granted Takeda an exclusive license of lubiprostone
to co-develop, commercialize, and sell products for
gastroenterology indications in the United States and Canada.
There are no defined contractual cash flows within the Takeda
Agreement for the grant of this license, but the Company did
receive a non-refundable up-front payment of $20.0 million
upon executing the Takeda Agreement. The license was granted to
Takeda on October 29, 2004 and will expire when the Takeda
Agreement expires or is terminated. Upon commercial launch,
Takeda shall, for the products sold by Takeda during the term of
the Takeda
|
17
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement, pay the Company pre-determined royalties on net
revenues on a quarterly basis. The level of royalties is tiered
based on the net sales recognized by Takeda. Royalty payments,
which the Company began to earn in April 2006 and receive in
July 2006, will cease when the Takeda Agreement is terminated
and all cash payments due to the Company are paid. The Company
has recorded product royalty revenue of approximately
$9.6 million and $4.5 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and
$11.9 million and $4.5 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. This revenue is
recorded as product royalty revenue in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company shall participate in the following committees, along
with Takeda: Joint Steering Committee, Joint Development
Committee, Joint Commercialization Committee and Joint
Manufacturing Committee. There are no separate cash flows
identified within the Takeda Agreement associated with the
participation by the Company in these committees. There is no
defined performance period for this obligation, but the
performance period will not exceed the term of the Takeda
Agreement. The Company expects its participation on all
committees to continue throughout the term of the Takeda
Agreement, except for the Joint Development Committee, which
will continue until development work is complete.
|
|
|
|
The Company shall provide development work necessary for an NDA
submission to the FDA for the treatment of Constipation and
irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, or IBS-C,
indications. Takeda shall fund the initial $30.0 million of
development costs and the two parties shall equally share any
required development costs in excess of $50.0 million.
Although there is no defined performance period for this
development work, the period to perform the work will not exceed
the term of the Takeda Agreement. In January 2006, the Company
received approval for its NDA for AMITIZA to treat Constipation
and completed and submitted the NDA for IBS-C to the FDA in June
2007.
|
As a result of its reassessment of the deliverables under the
Takeda Agreement (see Note 2), the Company determined there
were four separate units of accounting as of the inception of
the Takeda Agreement. The Company has assessed these required
deliverables under the guidance of
EITF 00-21
to determine which deliverables are considered separate units of
accounting. The Company determined that its participation in the
Joint Steering Committee, the Joint Manufacturing Committee and
the Joint Commercialization Committee has value to Takeda on a
stand-alone basis because the individual committee participants
provided by the Company have valuable expertise that the Company
believes support the success of the Takeda Agreement. Takeda
could have obtained similar expertise by hiring independent
consultants, but is relying instead on the expertise of the
Company.
The Company was also able to determine objective and reliable
evidence of the fair value of these deliverables, including
anticipated expenses expected to be incurred to meet its
obligations, in the form of contract agreements between the
Company and specialized consultants for other development
projects the Company is and has been involved with currently and
in the past. The Company was not, however, able to distinguish
stand-alone value for participation in the Joint Development
Committee separate from the Companys obligations to
perform development work of Constipation and IBS-C because the
participation in the Joint Development Committee was to occur
concurrently with the development work. Thus, the Company has
determined that there were four separate units of accounting
when the Takeda Agreement was executed
(1) participation in the Joint Steering Committee,
(2) participation in the Joint Manufacturing Committee,
(3) participation in the Joint Commercialization Committee
and (4) the combined requirement of the development work of
Constipation and IBS-C and participation in the Joint
Development Committee.
Upon receipt of the $20.0 million up-front payment, the
Company deferred approximately $2.4 million to be
recognized using the time-based model over the performance
period of the participation in these meetings. During the three
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized
approximately $37,000 of this deferred amount as collaboration
revenue on the condensed consolidated statements of operations
and comprehensive income and $74,000 of this deferred amount as
collaboration revenue during the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006. The related deferred revenue as of June 30,
2007 was approximately $2.0 million.
18
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Since the execution of the Takeda Agreement through
December 31, 2006, the Company deferred the residual amount
of the $20.0 million up-front payment totaling
approximately $17.6 million, development milestone payments
received totaling $50.0 million, and reimbursement of the
initial $30.0 million of research and development costs for
the development of AMITIZA for Constipation and IBS-C
indications. These deferred amounts were applied towards the
unit of accounting combining the participation in the Joint
Development Committee and the development of Constipation and
IBS-C and are being recognized using the time-based model over
the performance period of developing the Constipation and IBS-C
NDA submissions. The Company had originally estimated that it
would complete the development of the Constipation and IBS-C NDA
submissions in December 2006. The Company concluded in June 2006
that the estimated completion date should be revised to
May 2007. Subsequent to December 31, 2006, the Company
further extended the estimated completion date from May 2007 to
June 2007. During the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, the Company recognized approximately $4.9 million and
$9.7 million, respectively, of these deferred amounts as
research and development revenue in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income. During the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company
recognized approximately $11.0 million and
$31.7 million, respectively, of these deferred amounts as
research and development revenue in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income. There was no
related deferred revenue as of June 30, 2007. In June 2007,
the Company recognized, in full, $30.0 million from Takeda
upon the filing of the supplemental NDA for AMITIZA to treat
irritable bowel syndrome with constipation as the Company had
completed its development.
The Company incurred research and development costs for this
development work of approximately $1.9 million,
$2.0 million, $12.9 million and $4.9 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
On February 1, 2006, the Company entered into the
Supplemental Agreement with Takeda, which amends the
responsibilities of both the Company and Takeda for the
co-promotion of AMITIZA and clarifies the responsibilities and
funding arrangements for other marketing services to be
performed by both parties.
Upon execution of the Supplemental Agreement, the Company was
required to complete several deliverables,which Takeda was
responsible to fund. The following are the required deliverables
of the Company, along with the related contractual cash flows
from Takeda and the associated obligations and performance
period of the Company, when the Supplemental Agreement was
executed:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company shall co-promote AMITIZA with Takeda by employing a
sales force of approximately 38 representatives to supplement
Takedas sales activities. Takeda shall reimburse the
Company a specified amount per day per sales force
representative, but such reimbursements shall not exceed certain
pre-defined amounts. The term of this reimbursement arrangement
ceases five years following the first date that the Company
deployed sales representatives, which was in April 2006. The
Company has recognized approximately $1.1 million of
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
and approximately $2.1 million and $1.1 million of
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, reflecting these co-promotion reimbursements,
which is recorded as co-promotion revenue in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
|
|
|
|
The Company shall perform miscellaneous marketing activities for
AMITIZA, the majority of which would be reimbursed by Takeda.
There is no defined performance period, but the performance
period would not extend beyond January 31, 2007. The
Company has recorded no reimbursements of miscellaneous costs
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 but has recorded
$161,000, $158,000 and $162,000, of reimbursements of
miscellaneous costs for the three months ended June 30,
2006 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These amounts are recorded as co-promotion revenue
in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income.
|
The Company has determined that the required deliverables under
the Supplemental Agreement are economically independent of those
in the original Takeda Agreement. The Company had no obligations
to perform any
19
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
of the deliverables under the Supplemental Agreement at the time
the original Takeda Agreement was executed and the activities
were not considered to be, or contemplated as, deliverables at
that time. Subsequent to the execution of the original Takeda
Agreement, the Company agreed to perform co-promotion and other
marketing services for a fee that was negotiated at the time of
the Supplemental Agreement. The negotiated rates were determined
to be market compensation for services agreed to in the
Supplemental Agreement based upon the stand-alone value of the
economics of the new obligations. Therefore, the Company views
the deliverables under the Supplemental Agreement as
economically independent of those in the original Takeda
Agreement.
The Company has assessed these required deliverables under the
guidance of
EITF 00-21
to determine which deliverables are considered separate units of
accounting. The Company was able to determine that its sales
force has value to Takeda on a stand-alone basis because the
Company provided coverage in a market segment which could
increase the sales of AMITIZA. In negotiating the Supplemental
Agreement, the Company established the fair value for the
per-day
co-promotion rate using third-party evidence from contract sales
organizations. The Company has also determined that the
miscellaneous marketing activities have stand-alone value to
Takeda separate from the Companys efforts to perform its
obligations to implement and maintain its sales force. These
miscellaneous marketing services, which related primarily to
documenting and publicizing the medical benefits of the product,
could have been outsourced directly to a number of different
third parties (as the Company ultimately did), performed by
Takeda staff or eliminated entirely if not judged to have a
benefit which exceeded the related costs. Accordingly, these
deliverables are treated as separate units of accounting. The
Company is recognizing the cost reimbursements received for
these deliverables as co-promotion revenues when services are
performed and the reimbursement payments are due under the
Supplemental Agreement. For the three months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, the Company recognized approximately
$1.1 million, $1.1 million, $2.1 million and
$1.1 million, respectively, of co-promotion revenue for its
sales force efforts and approximately $0, $161,000, $158,000 and
$162,000, respectively, for its miscellaneous marketing efforts.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Joint
Commercialization Committee granted approval for the Company and
Takeda to begin three new studies related to funding
arrangements discussed in both the Takeda Agreement and the
Supplemental Agreement. The following are the three additional
deliverables of the Company, along with the related contractual
cash flows from Takeda and the associated obligations and
performance period of the Company, when the three studies were
agreed upon:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company shall perform studies in connection with changes to
labeling for Constipation. Takeda shall fund 70% of the
labeling studies and Sucampo shall fund the remaining 30%. There
is no defined performance period, but the performance period
will not exceed the term of the Takeda Agreement. The Company
initiated the first labeling study for Constipation in August
2006, which is expected to be completed in January 2008.
|
|
|
|
The Company shall perform studies in work for the development of
an additional indication for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.
Takeda shall fund all development work up to a maximum aggregate
of $50.0 million for each additional indication and
$20.0 million for each new formulation. If development
costs exceed these amounts, Takeda and the Company shall equally
share such excess costs. There is no defined performance period,
but the performance period will not exceed the term of the
Takeda Agreement. The Company initiated work on the first
additional indication for AMITIZA in July 2006, which is
estimated to be completed in June 2009 and is expected to exceed
$50.0 million in development costs.
|
|
|
|
The Company shall perform all development work necessary for
Phase IV studies, for which Takeda shall fund all
development work. There is no defined performance period, but
the performance period will not exceed the term of the
Supplemental Agreement. The Company began work on a
Phase IV study for Constipation in August 2006, which is
estimated to be completed in June 2008.
|
20
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The Company has assessed these required deliverables under the
guidance of
EITF 00-21
to determine which deliverables are considered separate units of
accounting. As a result of the Company and Takeda agreeing to
perform and fund these studies simultaneously, the Company
determined that there is no objective and reliable evidence to
determine the fair value for each of the studies. Accordingly,
the Company has combined these three required deliverables as a
single unit of accounting. All cash payments from Takeda related
to these three deliverables will be deferred upon receipt and
recognized over the entire period to complete the three studies
using the time-based model. The estimated completion date is
June 2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the
Company recognized approximately $3.0 million,
$0 million, $6.4 million and $0 million related
to these three deliverables as research and development revenue
on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income, respectively.
A summary of the activity under the Companys 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan is presented below for the six months ended
June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
|
|
|
Options outstanding,
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
826,200
|
|
|
$
|
9.02
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(25,925
|
)
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired
|
|
|
(159,375
|
)
|
|
|
3.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, June 30,
2007
|
|
|
640,900
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
|
$
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
518,075
|
|
|
|
8.37
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
532,525
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
|
$
|
2,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007, approximately $564,000 of total
unrecognized compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures,
related to non-vested awards are expected to be recognized over
a weighted average period of 4.73 years.
For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the
Companys consolidated annualized effective tax rate was
35.0% and 0%, respectively. For the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Companys consolidated
annualized effective tax rate was 35.2% and 0%, respectively. As
required under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting, the Company has
estimated its annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year
2007 and applied that rate to its income before income taxes in
determining its income tax provision for the interim periods.
21
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The Company has determined that it has three reportable
geographic segments based on the Companys method of
internal reporting, which disaggregates business by geographic
location. These segments are the United States, Europe and
Japan. The Company evaluates performance of these segments based
on income from operations. The reportable segments have
historically derived their revenue from joint collaboration and
strategic alliance agreements. Transactions between the segments
consist primarily of loans and the provision of research and
development services by the European and Japanese entities to
the domestic entity. Following is a summary of financial
information by reportable geographic segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development revenue
|
|
$
|
38,087
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,087
|
|
Contract revenue
related parties
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Product royalty revenue
|
|
|
9,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,562
|
|
Co-promotion revenue
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
48,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
48,934
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
27,409
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
28,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
21,478
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,859
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
Other non-operating income
(expense), net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
21,957
|
|
|
$
|
(149
|
)
|
|
$
|
(436
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
1,244
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development revenue
|
|
$
|
9,700
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,700
|
|
Contract revenue
related parties
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Product royalty revenue
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
Co-promotion revenue
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
15,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,432
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
12,511
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Other non-operating income, net
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
3,579
|
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
SUCAMPO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development revenue
|
|
$
|
47,453
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,453
|
|
Contract revenue
related parties
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
(420
|
)
|
|
|
230
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Product royalty revenue
|
|
|
11,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,871
|
|
Co-promotion revenue
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
61,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
(420
|
)
|
|
|
61,895
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
39,614
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
(420
|
)
|
|
|
40,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
22,202
|
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,398
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other non-operating income
(expense), net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
22,998
|
|
|
$
|
(317
|
)
|
|
$
|
(452
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
1,340
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development revenue
(restated)
|
|
$
|
32,141
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,141
|
|
Contract revenue (restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Contract revenue
related parties
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Collaboration revenue (restated)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Product royalty revenue
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
Co-promotion revenue (restated)
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues (restated)
|
|
|
38,071
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,600
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Other operating expenses (restated)
|
|
|
23,578
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
(restated)
|
|
|
14,463
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,633
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Other non-operating income, net
(restated)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
(restated)
|
|
$
|
15,455
|
|
|
$
|
1,234
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
16,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,540
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
91,613
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
2,168
|
|
|
$
|
(4,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
89,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
68,943
|
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
2,544
|
|
|
$
|
(4,899
|
)
|
|
$
|
67,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This Report on
Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements regarding us and our
business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements
include those that express plans, anticipation, intent,
contingency, goals, targets or future development
and/or
otherwise are not statements of historical fact. These
forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations
and projections about future events and they are subject to
risks and uncertainties known and unknown that could cause
actual results and developments to differ materially from those
expressed or implied in such statements.
Restatement
of Previously Issued Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
We have restated our previously issued condensed consolidated
financial statements and related footnotes for the six months
ended June 30, 2006. This was done to correct an error in
accounting for the revenue recognition of our collaboration and
license agreement and related agreements with Takeda
Pharmaceutical Company Limited, or Takeda. All amounts in this
discussion and analysis have been updated to reflect this
restatement. For additional information regarding this
restatement, see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
The error we are correcting in the restatement originated in the
fourth quarter of 2004 and continued throughout 2005 and part of
2006. The identification of this error occurred as a result of
our reevaluation of the assumptions we used under Emerging
Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables, or
EITF 00-21,
in accounting for arrangements with multiple deliverables that
require significant judgment and estimates.
During the preparation of our annual financial statements, we
reassessed the stand-alone value to Takeda of the deliverables
under our joint collaboration and license agreement with Takeda,
at the time we became obliged to make such deliverables, by
examining objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of
the undelivered items. As a result of this reassessment, we
determined that the previous application of a single unit of
accounting for the deliverables from the joint collaboration and
license agreement with Takeda was not appropriate. In addition,
we determined that the substantive milestone method of revenue
recognition we had been using was not appropriate to account for
the cash payments received from Takeda related to our completion
of these required deliverables and that a time-based model would
be more appropriate to account for these cash payments.
Accordingly, in the restated condensed consolidated financial
statements for the six months ended June 30, 2006, we
reduced the milestone revenue and increased research and
development revenue. Total revenue increased by
$4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
All data included in this discussion and analysis for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 are derived from our restated
financial statements for those periods. The financial statements
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 have not been
previously issued and have not been restated.
Overview
We are an emerging pharmaceutical company focused on the
discovery, development and commercialization of proprietary
drugs based on prostones, a class of compounds derived from
functional fatty acids that occur naturally in the human body.
In January 2006, we received marketing approval from the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for our first
product, AMITIZA, for the treatment of chronic idiopathic
constipation in adults.
We are party to a collaboration and license agreement with
Takeda to jointly develop and commercialize AMITIZA for chronic
idiopathic constipation, irritable bowel syndrome with
constipation, or IBS-C, opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, or
OBD, and other gastrointestinal indications in the United States
and Canada. We have the right to co-promote AMITIZA along with
Takeda in these markets. We and Takeda initiated commercial
sales of AMITIZA in the United States for the treatment of
chronic idiopathic constipation in adults in April 2006.
We and Takeda initiated commercial sales of AMITIZA for the
treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults in
April 2006, and we first generated product royalty revenue
in the three months ended June 30, 2006. Since inception we
have incurred operating losses and, as of June 30, 2007, we
had an accumulated deficit of $9.0 million.
24
We recognized net income of $14.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and $16.8 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2006. Historically, we have
generated losses resulting principally from costs incurred in
our research and development programs and from our general and
administrative expenses. We expect to continue to incur
significant and increasing expenses for the next several years
as we continue to expand our research and development
activities, seek regulatory approvals for additional indications
for AMITIZA and for other compounds as they are developed and
augment our sales and marketing capabilities. Whether we are
able to sustain profitability will depend upon our ability to
generate revenues in the future that exceed these expenses. In
the near term, our ability to generate product revenues will
depend primarily on the successful commercialization and
continued development of additional indications for AMITIZA.
We hold an exclusive worldwide royalty-bearing license from
Sucampo AG, an affiliate, to develop and commercialize AMITIZA
and all other prostone compounds covered by patents and patent
applications held by Sucampo AG. We are obligated to assign to
Sucampo AG all patentable improvements that we make in the field
of prostones, which Sucampo AG will in turn license back to us
on an exclusive basis. If we have not committed specified
development efforts to any prostone compound other than AMITIZA,
cobiprostone (or SPI-8811) SPI-8811 and SPI-017 by the end of a
specified period, which ends on the later of June 30, 2011
or the date upon which Drs. Kuno and Ueno, our founders, no
longer control our company, then the commercial rights to that
compound will revert to Sucampo AG, subject to a
15-month
extension in the case of any compound that we designate in good
faith as planned for development within that extension period.
Our
Clinical Development Programs
We are developing AMITIZA and our other prostone compounds for
the treatment of a broad range of diseases. The most advanced of
these programs are:
|
|
|
|
|
AMITIZA. In connection with our marketing
approval for AMITIZA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic
constipation in adults, we committed to the FDA to conduct
post-marketing studies to evaluate the safety of the product in
pediatric patients, in patients with renal impairment and in
patients with hepatic impairment. We initiated these studies in
January 2007. In addition, we are developing AMITIZA to treat
irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and opioid-induced
bowel dysfunction. We recently completed two pivotal
Phase III clinical trials of AMITIZA for the treatment of
irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and a follow-on
safety study to assess the long-term use of AMITIZA as a
treatment for this indication. Based on the results of these
trials, we are seeking marketing approval for AMITIZA for the
treatment of this indication and submitted a supplement to our
existing new drug application, or NDA, for AMITIZA in June 2007.
In addition, we plan to commence Phase III pivotal clinical
trials of AMITIZA for the treatment of opioid-induced bowel
dysfunction by the third quarter of 2007. Our collaboration and
co-promotion arrangement with Takeda also covers these
additional indications for AMITIZA.
|
|
|
|
SPI-8811. We are developing orally
administered SPI-8811 to treat various gastrointestinal and
liver disorders, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug,
or NSAID, induced ulcers, portal hypertension, non-alcoholic
fatty liver disease and gastrointestinal disorders associated
with cystic fibrosis. We also are planning to develop an inhaled
formulation of SPI-8811 for the treatment of respiratory
symptoms of cystic fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease. Our near term focus is on the development of SPI-8811
as a treatment for NSAID-induced ulcers. We have completed Phase
I clinical trials of SPI-8811 in healthy volunteers and plan to
commence a Phase II clinical trial of this product
candidate for the treatment of NSAID-induced ulcers by the third
quarter of 2007. We also plan to commence a Phase II
proof-of-concept study of SPI-8811 in patients with portal
hypertension in 2007.
|
|
|
|
SPI-017. We are developing SPI-017 to treat
vascular disease and central nervous system disorders. We are
initially focused on developing an intravenous formulation of
this product candidate for the treatment of peripheral arterial
disease. We also are developing an oral formulation of SPI-017
for the treatment of Alzheimers disease. We plan to
commence Phase I clinical trials of the intravenous formulation
of SPI-017 and Phase I clinical trials of the oral formulation
in 2008.
|
25
Financial
Terms of our Collaboration with Takeda
We entered into a
16-year
collaboration agreement with Takeda in October 2004 to jointly
develop and commercialize AMITIZA for gastrointestinal
indications in the United States and Canada. We also entered
into a related supplemental agreement with Takeda in February
2006. Under the terms of these agreements, we have received a
variety of payments and will have the opportunity to receive
additional payments in the future.
Up-front
Payment
Upon signing the original agreement with Takeda, we received a
non-refundable up-front payment of $20.0 million. We
deferred $2.4 million of this up-front payment associated
with our obligation to participate in joint committees with
Takeda and we are recognizing this amount as collaboration
revenue ratably over the
16-year life
of the agreement. We are recognizing the remaining
$17.6 million as research and development revenue ratably
over the estimated development period associated with the
chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome
with constipation indications, which we completed in June 2007
as evidenced by the filing with the FDA of a supplement to our
existing NDA for AMITIZA relating to the treatment of irritable
bowel syndrome with constipation.
Product
Development Milestone Payments
We have also recognized the following non-refundable payments
from Takeda reflecting our achievement of specific product
development milestones:
|
|
|
|
|
$10.0 million upon the filing of the NDA for AMITIZA to
treat chronic idiopathic constipation in March 2005;
|
|
|
|
$20.0 million upon the initiation of our Phase III
clinical trial related to AMITIZA for the treatment of irritable
bowel syndrome with constipation in May 2005;
|
|
|
|
$20.0 million upon the receipt of approval from the FDA for
AMITIZA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in
adults in January 2006; and
|
|
|
|
$30.0 million upon the filing of the supplemental NDA for
AMITIZA to treat irritable bowel syndrome in June 2007.
|
We have recognized each of these payments as research and
development revenue ratably over the estimated development
period associated with the chronic idiopathic constipation and
irritable bowel syndrome with constipation indications, which we
completed in June 2007.
In addition, our collaboration agreement requires that Takeda
pay us up to an additional aggregate of $60.0 million
conditioned upon our achievement of future regulatory milestones
relating to AMITIZA. We would recognize these payments as
research and development revenue ratably over the respective
performance periods.
Research
and Development Cost-Sharing for AMITIZA
Our collaboration agreement with Takeda provides for the sharing
between Takeda and us of the costs of our research and
development activities for AMITIZA in the United States and
Canada as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Takeda was responsible for the first $30.0 million in
research and development expenses we incurred after October 2004
related to AMITIZA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic
constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. We
received reimbursement payments from Takeda of $1.5 million
in 2004 and $28.5 million in 2005. We recognized each of
these payments as research and development revenue ratably over
the estimated development period associated with the chronic
idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with
constipation indications, which was completed by June 2007.
|
We were responsible for the next $20.0 million in research
and development expenses we incurred related to AMITIZA for the
treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel
syndrome with constipation. Thereafter, any expenses in excess
of $50.0 million are shared equally between Takeda and us.
Of
26
this next $20.0 million, we had incurred $12.9 million
through June 30, 2007, which was the completion of these
activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we had
incurred $3.9 million.
|
|
|
|
|
For research and development expenses relating to changing or
expanding the labeling of AMITIZA to treat chronic idiopathic
constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation,
Takeda is responsible for 70% of these expenses and we are
responsible for 30%. We have not incurred any expenses of this
nature to date. However, in connection with our marketing
approval for AMITIZA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic
constipation in adults, we committed to the FDA to conduct
post-marketing studies to evaluate the safety of the product in
patients with renal impairment and patients with hepatic
impairment. We initiated these studies in January 2007. The
expenses of these studies, which we began to incur in the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, are being shared 70% by
Takeda and 30% by us. Through June 30, 2007, we had
incurred $1.1 million of these expenses, of which we will
be reimbursed $738,000.
|
|
|
|
The expense of Phase IV clinical trials of AMITIZA for the
treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in pediatric
patients that we initiated in January 2007 will be borne by
Takeda in full. As of June 30, 2007, we had incurred
$3.0 million of these expenses, all of which will be
reimbursed by Takeda.
|
|
|
|
For expenses in connection with additional clinical trials
required by regulatory authorities relating to AMITIZA to treat
chronic idiopathic constipation or irritable bowel syndrome with
constipation, Takeda and we are responsible to share these
expenses equally. We have not incurred any expenses of this
nature to date.
|
|
|
|
Takeda is responsible for the first $50.0 million in
expenses we incur related to the development of AMITIZA for each
additional indication other than chronic idiopathic constipation
and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, and any expenses
in excess of $50.0 million are shared equally between
Takeda and us. We plan to initiate clinical trials of AMITIZA
for the treatment of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction by the
third quarter of 2007. We began incurring expenses for these
trials in the third quarter of 2006. Currently, we do not
anticipate the aggregate expenses necessary to complete our
development of AMITIZA for this indication will exceed
$54.0 million, of which Takeda will be responsible for
$52.0 million and we will be responsible for
$2.0 million. As of June 30, 2007, we had incurred
$3.7 million of these expenses.
|
|
|
|
Takeda is responsible for the first $20.0 million in
expenses we incur related to the development of each new
formulation of AMITIZA, and any expenses in excess of
$20.0 million are shared equally between Takeda and us. We
have not initiated any development of new formulation nor
incurred any expenses of this nature.
|
Co-Promotion
Expense Reimbursements
In connection with our exercise of our co-promotion rights under
the collaboration agreement and our entry into the related
supplemental agreement in February 2006, Takeda agreed to
reimburse us for a portion of our expenses related to our
specialty sales force. These reimbursements cover approximately
80% of the direct costs for our sales force. The sales
representatives were initially provided under our contract with
Ventiv Commercial Services, LLC, or Ventiv, an independent
contract sales organization. We terminated this contract with
Ventiv effective July 1, 2007. Simultaneously, on
June 30, 2007, the sales representatives became our
employees. This internalization was accomplished by rolling over
approximately 60% of the existing Ventiv sales representatives
and recruiting experienced sales representatives from other
pharmaceutical sales forces. We began to receive monthly
reimbursement from Takeda for these expenses during the quarter
ended June 30, 2006, reflecting the commencement by our
sales representatives of their activities in April 2006. We had
recognized $1.1 million of co-promotion revenue reflecting
these reimbursements in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007, we recognized $1.1 million and
$2.1 million, respectively, of co-promotion revenue
reflecting these reimbursements.
Takeda also agreed in the supplemental agreement to reimburse us
for the costs we incur in connection with specified
miscellaneous marketing activities related to the promotion of
AMITIZA. During the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, we recognized $0 and $161,000, respectively. During the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recognized
$158,000 and $162,000, respectively. We completed the
miscellaneous marketing
27
activities to which these reimbursements relate in the quarter
ended March 31, 2007 and, accordingly, we do not expect to
recognize additional co-promotion revenue related to these
activities.
Product
Royalty Revenue
Takeda is obligated to pay us a varying royalty based on a
percentage of the net sales revenue from the sale of AMITIZA in
the United States and Canada. The actual percentage will depend
on the level of net sales revenue during each calendar year. All
sales of AMITIZA in the United States and Canada, including
those arranged by our specialty sales force, will be made
through Takeda. We began to recognize product royalty revenue in
the quarter ended June 30, 2006, reflecting the
commencement of commercial sales of AMITIZA in April 2006.
During the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we
recognized a total of $9.6 million and $4.5 million,
respectively, as product royalty revenue. During the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recognized
$11.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively, as
product royalty revenue.
Commercialization
Milestone Payments
Our collaboration agreement also requires Takeda to pay us up to
an additional aggregate of $50.0 million conditioned upon
the achievement of specified targets for annual net sales
revenue from AMITIZA in the United States and Canada. These
targets had not been met as of June 30, 2007.
Takeda
Cash Flows and Revenue
The following table summarizes the cash streams and related
revenue recognition under the Takeda collaboration agreement and
the related supplemental agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Received
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
for the Six
|
|
|
for the Six
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Deferred at
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Deferred at
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-front payment associated with
our obligation to participate in joint committees with Takeda
|
|
$
|
2,058
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-front payment
remainder
|
|
$
|
1,977
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,977
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Development milestones
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement of research and
development expenses
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
9,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,951
|
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$
|
47,453
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
|
Receivable at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable at
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Product royalty
revenue
|
|
$
|
2,029
|
|
|
$
|
4,339
|
|
|
$
|
11,871
|
|
|
$
|
9,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-promotion revenue
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
2,229
|
|
|
$
|
2,267
|
|
|
$
|
746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development milestone
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement of research and
development expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,387
|
|
|
$
|
6,367
|
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Financial
Terms of our License from Sucampo AG
Under our license agreement with our affiliate, Sucampo AG, we
are required to pay Sucampo AG 5% of every milestone payment we
receive from a sublicensee, such as Takeda. We also are
obligated to make the following milestone payments to Sucampo AG:
|
|
|
|
|
$500,000 upon initiation of the first Phase II clinical
trial for each compound in each of three territories covered by
the license: North, Central and South America, including the
Caribbean; Asia; and the rest of the world; and
|
|
|
|
$1.0 million for the first NDA filing or comparable foreign
regulatory filing for each compound in each of these three
territories.
|
In addition, we are required to pay Sucampo AG, on a
country-by-country
basis, royalty payments of 6.5% of net sales for every product
covered by existing patents and, if applicable, thereafter 4.25%
of net sales for every product candidate covered by new or
improvement patents assigned by us to Sucampo AG. With respect
to sales of AMITIZA in North, Central and South America,
including the Caribbean, the rates for these royalty payments
are set at 3.2% and 2.1% of net sales, respectively. The product
royalties that we pay to Sucampo AG are based on total product
net sales, whether by us or a sublicensee, and not on amounts
actually received by us. We expensed $2.1 million in
product royalties to Sucampo AG during the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and $1.7 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2006, reflecting 3.2% of net sales for
AMITIZA during each of these periods.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we paid Sucampo
AG $1.5 million, reflecting 5% of the $30.0 million
milestone that we received from Takeda with respect to the
filing of the NDA for AMITIZA to treat irritable bowel syndrome
with constipation in June 2007. We characterized this payment as
a milestone royalty and we expensed it as incurred.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we paid Sucampo
AG $1.25 million, reflecting 5% of the $20.0 million
up-front payment that we received from Takeda with respect to
AMITIZA in October 2004 and $250,000 upon marketing approval of
AMITIZA by the FDA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic
constipation in adults. We characterized these payments as
milestone royalties and we expensed them as incurred.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. The preparation of our condensed consolidated
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments
that affect our reported assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses. Actual results may differ significantly from those
estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
We regard an accounting estimate or assumption underlying our
financial statements as a critical accounting estimate if:
|
|
|
|
|
the nature of the estimate or assumption is material due to the
level of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for
highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters
to change; and
|
|
|
|
the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial
condition or operating performance is material.
|
Our significant accounting policies are described in more detail
in Note 3 of our condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue
Recognition Collaboration and License
Agreements
Our primary sources of revenue include up-front payments,
product development milestone payments, reimbursements of
research and development expenses, reimbursement of co-promotion
costs related to our specialty sales force and miscellaneous
marketing activities, and product royalties. We recognize
revenue from these sources in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin, or SAB, No. 104, Revenue
Recognition, EITF
No. 99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an
Agent, and EITF
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables. The application of
EITF 00-21
requires subjective analysis and
29
requires us to make estimates and assumptions about whether
deliverables within multiple-element arrangements are separable
from the other aspects of the contractual arrangement into
separate units of accounting and, if so, to determine the fair
value to be allocated to each unit of accounting.
We evaluated the multiple deliverables within our joint
collaboration and license agreement and the related supplemental
agreement with Takeda in accordance with the provisions of
EITF 00-21
to determine whether our deliverables have value to Takeda on a
stand-alone basis and whether objective reliable evidence of
fair value of the undelivered items exists. We separately
evaluate deliverables that meet these criteria for the purposes
of revenue recognition. We combine deliverables that do not meet
these criteria and account for them as a single unit of
accounting.
In accordance with
EITF 00-21,
we recognize the cash flows associated with the individual units
of accounting from the joint collaboration and license agreement
as revenue using a time-based model that recognizes the revenue
ratably over the period in which we complete our performance
requirements. However, revenue is limited to amounts that are
non-refundable and that Takeda is contractually obligated to
pay. With respect to the portion of the up-front payment we
attributed to our obligation to participate in joint committees
with Takeda, which we present as collaboration revenue, the
performance period is the
16-year term
of the collaboration agreement. With respect to the remainder of
the up-front payment, the product development milestone payments
and the reimbursement of research and development expenses, all
of which we present as research and development revenue, the
performance period is the estimated development period for
AMITIZA to treat chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable
bowel syndrome with constipation. The performance period was
completed on June 29, 2007 as evidenced by the filing with
the FDA of a supplement to our existing NDA for AMITIZA relating
to the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.
We have determined that we are acting as a principal under the
collaboration agreement and, as such, we record these amounts on
a gross basis as collaboration revenue and as research and
development revenue.
Reimbursements of co-promotion costs under the supplemental
agreement with Takeda, including costs associated with our
specialty sales force and miscellaneous marketing activities,
are recognized as co-promotion revenue as the related costs are
incurred and Takeda becomes contractually obligated to pay the
amounts. We have determined that we are acting as a principal
under the supplemental agreement and, as such, we record
reimbursements of these amounts on a gross basis as co-promotion
revenue.
Product royalty revenue is based on third-party sales of
licensed products. We record these amounts on the accrual basis
when earned in accordance with contractual terms when
third-party results are reliably measurable, collectability is
reasonably assured and all other revenue recognition criteria
are met. Because of the lack of historical data regarding sales
returns, we do not report as revenue royalty payments related to
the portion of sales by Takeda that are subject to a right of
return until the right of return lapses.
We do not immediately recognize as revenue option fees received
for other potential joint collaboration and license agreements
with Takeda because the transactions do not represent a separate
earnings process. Our policy is to recognize revenue immediately
upon expiration of the option or to commence revenue recognition
upon exercise of the option and continue recognition over the
estimated performance period because we will have contingent
performance obligations if and when the options are exercised.
We record option fees as contract revenue when they are
recognized.
Accrued
Expenses
As part of our process of preparing our condensed consolidated
financial statements, we are required to estimate accrued
expenses. This process involves reviewing and identifying
services which have been performed by third parties on our
behalf and determining the value of these services. Examples of
these services are payments to clinical investigators,
professional fees, such as accountants and attorneys
fees, and payments to contracted service organizations. In
addition, we make estimates of costs incurred to date but not
yet invoiced to us in relation to external contract research
organizations and clinical site costs. We analyze the progress
of clinical trials, including levels of patient enrollment,
invoices received and contracted costs, when evaluating the
adequacy of the accrued liabilities. We must make significant
judgments and estimates in determining the accrued balance in
any accounting period.
30
In connection with these service fees, our estimates are most
affected by our understanding of the status and timing of
services provided relative to the actual levels of services
incurred by the service providers. The majority of our service
providers invoice us monthly in arrears for services performed.
In the event we do not identify costs that have begun to be
incurred or we under-estimate or over-estimate the level of
services performed or the costs of such services, our reported
expenses for the relevant period would be too low or too high.
We must also sometimes make judgments about the date on which
services commence, the level of services performed on or before
a given date and the cost of such services. We make these
judgments based upon the facts and circumstances known to us in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment,
or SFAS 123R, a revision of SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
SFAS 123R requires companies to recognize expense
associated with share-based compensation arrangements to
employees, including employee stock options, using a fair
value-based option-pricing model, and eliminates the alternative
to use the intrinsic-value method of accounting for share-based
payments to employees as specified in Accounting Principles
Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees. The standard generally
allows two alternative transition methods in the year of
adoption prospective transition method and
retroactive transition method with restatement of prior
financial statements to include the same amounts that were
previously included in the SFAS 123 pro forma disclosures.
Upon our adoption of SFAS 123R, we began using the
prospective transition method of implementation. According to
the prospective transition method, the previously issued
financial statements were not adjusted.
Under the prospective transition method, we are recognizing
compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted
subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair
value estimated in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS 123R.
For recording our stock-based compensation expense under
SFAS 123R, we have chosen to use:
|
|
|
|
|
the straight-line method of allocating compensation cost;
|
|
|
|
the Black-Scholes model as our chosen option-pricing model;
|
|
|
|
the simplified method to calculate the expected term for options
as discussed under SAB No. 7, Share-Based
Payment; and
|
|
|
|
an estimate of expected volatility based on the historical
volatility of similar entities whose share prices are publicly
available.
|
Our condensed consolidated financial statements for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 reflect the impact of adopting
SFAS 123R. During the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of
$316,000 and $2.7 million under SFAS 123R, which
related to employee stock options granted in May 2006 and August
2006.
On June 19, 2007, the Compensation Committee of our board
of directors authorized a one-time stock and cash award to each
of our founders. These awards were granted on June 29, 2007
when the founders agreed to their terms and settled on
August 2, 2007 upon the effectiveness of the initial public
offering. The Compensation Committee intended for these awards
to compensate the founders for the lost value of stock options
that had been granted to them in 2001 and 2002 and had been
understood by them to have ten-year terms, but which had expired
in 2006 and early 2007 as a result of the terms of the 2001
Stock Incentive Plan. The expired options would have entitled
the founders to purchase an aggregate of 578,000 shares of
class A common stock at a price of $0.21 per share and
136,000 shares at a price of $2.95 per share. These awards
were fully vested at the grant date.
Upon the completion of the initial public offering, these stock
and cash awards had an aggregate value equal to the difference
between the value of the shares that could have been purchased
under each of the expired options, determined on the basis of
the public offering price per share of $11.50 in the initial
public offering, and the respective aggregate exercise prices
for such shares as provided in the option agreements.
31
These awards consisted of a combination of cash and shares of
class A common stock. Of the aggregate value of each award,
40% was payable in cash and 60% in stock. For purposes of
determining the number of shares of class A common stock to
be issued in connection with each award, the stock was valued on
the basis of the public offering price per share in the initial
public offering.
The estimated fair value of these awards was based on using the
Black-Scholes pricing model, as allowed under SFAS 123R,
totaling $10.2 million on grant date. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007, we recorded $10.2 million
of general and administrative expense for these awards, of which
$4.1 million was recorded as Other
liabilities related parties for the cash
settlement portion and $6.1 million as Additional
paid-in capital for the stock settlement portion. The
liability portion of the awards will be adjusted based upon the
final cash settlement amount, but the equity portion is fixed
upon the grant date.
When the initial public offering was completed subsequent to
June 30, 2007, the awards were settled and
401,133 shares of class A common stock were issued to
the founders. In addition, we recorded an adjustment to finalize
the liability portion of the awards to reduce the liability to
$3.1 million, which will be the amount paid to the founders.
Given the lack of an active public market for our common stock
prior to the completion of the initial public offering in August
2007, our board of directors determined the fair value of our
class A common stock for valuing stock option awards. In
establishing the estimates of fair value, our board of directors
considered the guidance set forth in the AICPA Practice Guide,
Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities
Issued as Compensation, and made retrospective
determinations of fair value. The board of directors gave
significant consideration to the price of the class A
common stock sold to unrelated third parties in the first half
of 2006 in determining fair value for purposes of the stock
options granted to employees shortly after the sales occurred.
Determining the fair value of our class A common stock
requires making complex and subjective judgments. Our approach
to valuation is based on a discounted future cash flow approach
that uses our estimates of revenue, driven by assumed market
growth rates, and estimated costs as well as appropriate
discount rates. These estimates are consistent with the plans
and estimates that we use to manage our business. There is
inherent uncertainty in making these estimates. Although it is
reasonable to expect that the completion of our initial public
offering will add value to the shares because they will have
increased liquidity and marketability, the amount of additional
value cannot be measured with precision or certainty.
Income
Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial
statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each
of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We follow SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
This process requires us to estimate our actual current tax
exposure while assessing our temporary differences resulting
from the differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue,
for tax and accounting purposes. These differences have resulted
in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in
our consolidated balance sheets. We record a valuation allowance
to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more
likely than not to be realized. We consider forecasted earnings,
future taxable income, the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions
in which we operate, and prudent and feasible tax planning
strategies in determining the need for a valuation allowance. In
the event we were to determine that we would not be able to
realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the
future, we would charge an adjustment to earnings for the
deferred tax assets in the period in which we make that
determination. Likewise, if we later determine that it is more
likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be
realized, we would reverse the applicable portion of the
previously provided valuation allowance. In order for us to
realize our deferred tax assets we must be able to generate
sufficient taxable income in the tax jurisdictions in which our
deferred tax assets are located.
Significant judgment is required in determining the provision
for income taxes and, in particular, any valuation allowance
recorded against our deferred tax assets. We have recorded a
partial valuation allowance of $9.9 million as of
December 31, 2006, which resulted in a net deferred tax
asset of $4.9 million as of December 31, 2006, due to
uncertainties related to our ability to utilize a portion of the
deferred tax assets in years beyond 2007. Significant future
events, including marketing approval by the FDA of AMITIZA for
the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, are
not in our control and could affect our future earnings
potential and consequently the amount
32
of deferred tax assets that will be utilized. We determined the
amount of the valuation allowance based on our estimates of
income in the jurisdictions in which we operate over the periods
in which the related deferred tax assets are recoverable.
As of December 31, 2006, we had foreign net operating loss
carryforwards of $2.2 million. The foreign net operating
loss carryforwards will begin to expire on December 31,
2010. As of December 31, 2006, we had U.S. general
business tax credits of $4.4 million, which also may be
available to offset future income tax liabilities and will
expire if not utilized at various dates beginning
December 31, 2022. We have recorded a partial valuation
allowance as an offset to our net deferred tax assets due to the
uncertainty in determining the timing of the realization of
certain tax benefits. In the event that we determine that we
will be able to realize all or a portion of these assets, we
will make an adjustment to the valuation allowance. The Tax
Reform Act of 1986 contains provisions that may limit our
ability to use our credits available in any given year in which
there has been a substantial change in ownership interest, as
defined. The realization of the benefits of the tax credits is
dependent on sufficient taxable income in future years. Lack of
earnings, a change in the ownership of our company, or the
application of the alternative minimum tax rules could adversely
affect our ability to utilize these tax credits.
Related
Party Transactions
As part of our operations, we enter into transactions with our
affiliates. At the time of the transaction, we estimate the fair
market value of the transaction based upon estimates of net
present value or comparable third party information. For
material transactions with our foreign subsidiaries and
affiliates, we have evaluated the terms of transactions similar
to those that would have prevailed had the entities not been
affiliated.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of three months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30,
2006
Revenues
The following table summarizes our revenues for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development revenue
|
|
$
|
38,087
|
|
|
$
|
9,700
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Contract revenue
related parties
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Product royalty revenue
|
|
|
9,562
|
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
Co-promotion revenue
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
48,934
|
|
|
$
|
15,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues were $48.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 compared to $15.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of
$33.5 million. This increase was primarily due to the
recognition of the $30.0 million milestone payment earned
from Takeda upon the filing of the supplemental NDA for AMITIZA
to treat irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in June 2007
and the $5.1 million increase in product royalty revenue
from sales of AMITIZA.
Research and development revenue was $38.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to
$9.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
an increase of $28.4 million. This increase was primarily
due to our completion of the development of AMITIZA to treat
chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome
with constipation, which ended June 30, 2007 and the
recognition as revenue of payments previously received from
Takeda. We recognized our revenue for this development work
ratably over the estimated performance period associated with
the development of AMITIZA.
33
The specific revenue streams associated with research and
development revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
In March and May 2005, we received development milestone
payments from Takeda totaling $30.0 million related to our
efforts to develop AMITIZA. We recognized these payments as
research and development revenue ratably over the performance
period, resulting in $1.5 million of research and
development revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2007 and $2.9 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2006. The smaller amount of revenue recognized for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 is a result of our
determinations to extend the estimated completion of the
development period from May 2007 to June 2007.
|
|
|
|
In January 2006, we received a $20.0 million development
milestone payment from Takeda related to our efforts to develop
AMITIZA, which we recognized as research and development revenue
ratably over the performance period, resulting in
$1.0 million of research and development revenue for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and $2.0 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2006. We recognized a
significant portion of this milestone payment in the three
months ended June 30, 2006, the quarter in which it was
received, reflecting the fact that we were then well into the
estimated development period. The smaller amount of revenue for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 also reflects our
determinations, subsequent to our receipt of this payment, to
extend the estimated completion of the development period.
|
|
|
|
We have received a total of $30.0 million of reimbursement
payments for research and development costs from Takeda related
to our efforts to develop AMITIZA, which we recognized as
research and development revenue ratably over the performance
period, resulting in $1.5 million of research and
development revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2007 and $3.0 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2006. The smaller amount of revenue recognized for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 is a result of our
determinations to extend the estimated completion of the
development period.
|
|
|
|
In October 2004, we received an up-front payment of
$20.0 million from Takeda, of which $17.6 million was
associated with the development of AMITIZA. This amount was
recognized ratably over the estimated performance period,
resulting in $0.9 million of research and development
revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
$1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
The smaller amount of revenue recognized for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 is a result of our determination in
June 2006 to extend the estimated completion of the development
period.
|
|
|
|
We also began to perform services and receive payments from
Takeda during the third quarter of 2006 for the following three
deliverables: post-marketing studies to evaluate the safety of
AMITIZA in patients with renal impairment and patients with
hepatic impairment, Phase IV clinical trials of AMITIZA for
the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in pediatric
patients and clinical trials of AMITIZA for the treatment of
opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Total research and development
revenue associated with these three deliverables for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 was $3.0 million.
|
|
|
|
We recognized $30.0 million in revenue from Takeda for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 upon the filing of the
supplemental NDA for AMITIZA to treat irritable bowel syndrome
with constipation. This was recognized as revenue upon achieving
the milestone because it was the culmination of the earnings
process to file the NDA and supplemental NDA for chronic
idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with
constipation.
|
We began to recognize product royalty payments from Takeda as
revenue in the second quarter of 2006 following the product
launch of AMITIZA. For the three months ended June 30,
2007, we recognized $9.6 million of product royalty revenue
compared to $4.5 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2006. This increase reflects the higher market
penetration of AMITIZA resulting from the withdrawal of Zelnorm,
a competing product, from the U.S. market.
We began to receive reimbursement of costs for our sales force
in the second quarter of 2006 following the product launch of
AMITIZA. For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
we recognized $1.1 million of co-promotion revenues for
reimbursement of sales force costs.
34
Research
and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses represent costs incurred in
connection with the in-licensing of our compounds, clinical
trials, activities associated with regulatory filings and
manufacturing efforts. Currently, we outsource our clinical
trials to independent contract research organizations in order
to minimize our overhead. We expense our research and
development costs as incurred.
Total research and development expenses for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 were $7.3 million compared to
$3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
an increase of $3.9 million. In the three months ended
June 30, 2006, our research and development expenses were
primarily those associated with the ongoing Phase III
clinical trials of AMITIZA for the treatment of irritable bowel
syndrome with constipation. In the three months ended
June 30, 2007, our research and development expenses were
primarily those associated with the end of the
IBS-C trial;
the initiation of post-marketing studies of AMITIZA to evaluate
its safety in pediatric patients, in patients with renal
impairment and in patients with hepatic impairment;
Phase III clinical trials for OBD; and a Phase II
clinical trial for the treatment and prevention of NSAID-induced
ulcers.
We consider the continued development of our product pipeline
crucial to our success, and we anticipate that our research and
development costs will continue to increase as we advance our
research and development activities associated with our product
candidates.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
expenses for salaries and related personnel costs and expenses
for corporate activities.
The following table summarizes our general and administrative
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related
costs
|
|
$
|
1,696
|
|
|
$
|
1,410
|
|
Legal and consulting expenses
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
Founders stock-based award
|
|
|
10,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,802
|
|
|
$
|
5,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses were $13.8 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to
$5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
an increase of $8.6 million. This increase was primarily
due to the founders stock-based award of
$10.2 million, offset in part by the decline in stock-based
compensation expense from $2.3 million in the prior year.
Additionally, there were increases in general and administrative
expenses related to increased operational headcount and costs
related to our operation of Sucampo Pharma Europe, Ltd., or
Sucampo Europe, and Sucampo Pharma, Ltd., or Sucampo Japan. We
expect to incur significant increases in our general and
administrative expenses as we adopt public reporting
requirements, implement enhanced financial reporting controls to
comply with Sarbanes-Oxley and improve consolidation procedures
and controls related to Sucampo Europe and Sucampo Japan.
Selling
and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses represent costs we incur to
co-promote AMITIZA and other selling and marketing expenses,
including costs for market research and analysis, marketing and
promotional materials, product samples and other costs.
35
Selling and marketing expenses were $3.7 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to
$3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
an increase of $0.6 million. This increase was due to costs
for market research and analysis, marketing and promotional
materials, product samples and other costs.
In connection with our termination of our contract sales
agreement with Ventiv and our internalization of our specialty
sales force, we expect to incur additional expenses of
approximately $250,000 related to the transition, including
recruiting and training expenses and a conversion fee we will
pay to Ventiv, which will affect our selling and marketing
expenses for the quarter ending September 30, 2007.
Milestone
Royalties to Related Parties
Milestone royalties to related parties were $1.5 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2007. In the three
months ended June 30, 2006, we did not incur any milestone
royalties. As of June 30, 2007, the $1.5 million milestone
royalty was accrued, reflecting the 5% we owe to Sucampo AG with
respect to the $30.0 million development milestone payment
we earned from Takeda during that period.
Product
Royalties to Related Parties
Product royalties to related parties represent our obligation to
pay Sucampo AG a royalty of 3.2% of net sales of AMITIZA. The
product royalties that we pay to Sucampo AG are based on total
product net sales, whether by us or a sublicensee, and not on
amounts actually received by us. We began to incur product
royalty expenses for net sales of AMITIZA in the second quarter
of 2006 following the product launch of AMITIZA. In the three
months ended June 30, 2007, we expensed $1.7 million
in product royalties to related parties compared to $967,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Income
Taxes
As required under Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, or
APB No. 28, we have estimated our annual effective tax rate
for the full fiscal year 2007 and applied that rate to our
income before income taxes in determining our provision for
income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006. For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
our consolidated annualized effective tax rate was 35.0% and 0%,
respectively. The increase in the annualized effective tax rate
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from the three
months ended June 30, 2006 was due to the utilization of
approximately $4.0 million of U.S. deferred tax assets
and an increase in current tax expense resulting from the income
earned in the current period. The utilization of our
U.S. deferred tax assets for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 was offset by a corresponding release of our
valuation allowance, which resulted in a 0% effective tax rate.
As of June 30, 2007, our remaining valuation allowance
against our U.S. deferred tax assets was $8.6 million.
Comparison
of six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30,
2006
Revenues
The following table summarizes our revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Research and development revenue
|
|
$
|
47,453
|
|
|
$
|
32,141
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Collaboration revenue
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Contract revenue
related parties
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Product royalty revenue
|
|
|
11,871
|
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
Co-promotion revenue
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
61,895
|
|
|
$
|
39,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Total revenues were $61.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 compared to $39.6 million (restated) for
the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of
$22.3 million. This increase was primarily due to the
recognition of $30.0 million for a research and development
milestone payment earned from Takeda upon the filing of the
supplemental NDA for AMITIZA to treat irritable bowel syndrome
with constipation in June 2007 and the $7.4 million
increase in product royalty revenue from sales of AMITIZA.
Research and development revenue was $47.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to
$32.1 million (restated) for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, an increase of $15.4 million. This
increase was primarily due to completion of our development of
AMITIZA to treat chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable
bowel syndrome with constipation and the recognition of payments
previously received from Takeda. We recognize our revenue for
this development work ratably over the estimated performance
period associated with the development of AMITIZA.
The specific revenue streams associated with research and
development revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
In March and May 2005, we received development milestone
payments from Takeda totaling $30.0 million related to our
efforts to develop AMITIZA. We recognized these payments as
research and development revenue ratably over the performance
period, resulting in $3.4 million of research and
development revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006. The smaller amount of revenue recognized for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 is a result of our
determinations to extend the estimated completion of the
development period.
|
|
|
|
In January 2006, we received a $20.0 million development
milestone payment from Takeda related to our efforts to develop
AMITIZA, which we recognized as research and development revenue
ratably over the performance period, resulting in
$2.2 million of research and development revenue for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and $15.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2006. We recognized a
significant portion of this milestone payment in the three
months ended March 31, 2006, the quarter in which it was
received, reflecting the fact that we were then well into the
estimated development period. The smaller amount of revenue for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 also reflects our
determinations, subsequent to our receipt of this payment, to
extend the estimated completion of the development period.
|
|
|
|
We have received a total of $30.0 million of reimbursement
payments for research and development costs from Takeda related
to our efforts to develop AMITIZA, which we recognized as
research and development revenue ratably over the performance
period, resulting in $3.4 million of research and
development revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006. The smaller amount of revenue recognized for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 is a result of our
determinations to extend the estimated completion of the
development period.
|
|
|
|
In October 2004, we received an up-front payment of
$20.0 million from Takeda, of which $17.6 million was
associated with the development of AMITIZA. This amount was
recognized ratably over the estimated performance period,
resulting in $2.0 million and $3.8 million of research
and development revenue for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively. The smaller amount of revenue
recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is a
result of our determination in June 2006 to extend the estimated
completion of the development period.
|
|
|
|
We also began to perform services and receive payments from
Takeda during the third quarter of 2006 for the following three
deliverables: post-marketing studies to evaluate the safety of
AMITIZA in patients with renal impairment and patients with
hepatic impairment, Phase IV clinical trials of AMITIZA for
the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in pediatric
patients and clinical trials of AMITIZA for the treatment of
opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Total research and development
revenue associated with these three deliverables for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 was $5.3 million.
|
|
|
|
We recognized $30.0 million in revenue from Takeda for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 upon the filing of the
supplemental NDA for AMITIZA to treat irritable bowel syndrome
with constipation. This was recognized as revenue upon achieving
the milestone because it was the culmination of the earnings
process
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
to file the NDA and supplemental NDA for chronic idiopathic
constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.
|
We had no contract revenue for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 compared to $1.5 million (restated) for
the six months ended June 30, 2006. Contract revenue
represents amounts released from previously deferred revenue
that we recognized upon the expiration of the option granted to
Takeda for joint development and commercialization rights for
AMITIZA in Europe, Africa and the Middle East.
We began to recognize product royalty payments from Takeda as
revenue in the second quarter of 2006 following the product
launch of AMITIZA. For the six months ended June 30, 2007,
we recognized $11.9 million of product royalty revenue
compared to $4.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006.
We began to receive reimbursement of costs for our sales force
in the second quarter of 2006 following the product launch of
AMITIZA. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we
recognized $2.3 million of co-promotion revenues, of which
approximately $158,000 was for reimbursement of costs for
miscellaneous marketing activities and approximately
$2.1 million was for reimbursement of sales force costs.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded
$1.3 million (restated) as co-promotion revenues, of which
approximately $162,000 was for reimbursement of costs for
miscellaneous marketing activities and $1.1 million was for
reimbursement of sales force costs.
Research
and Development Expenses
Total research and development expenses for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 were $13.3 million compared to
$9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006,
an increase of $3.8 million. The higher costs in 2007
reflect the significant research and development expenses
incurred by us during that period in connection with the filing
of the supplemental NDA for the treatment of irritable bowel
syndrome with constipation; the initiation of post-marketing
safety studies in pediatric patients, in patients with renal
impairment and in patients with hepatic impairment;
Phase III studies for OBD; and a Phase II study of
NSAID-induced ulcers. In 2006, our research and development
expenses were primarily those associated with the ongoing
Phase III clinical trials of AMITIZA for the treatment of
irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.
General
and Administrative Expenses
The following summarizes our general and administrative expenses
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related
costs
|
|
$
|
3,243
|
|
|
$
|
2,799
|
|
Legal and consulting expenses
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
Founders stock-based awards
|
|
|
10,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,635
|
|
|
$
|
8,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses were $16.6 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to
$8.2 million (restated) for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, an increase of $8.4 million. This
increase was due primarily to the founders stock-based
award of $10.2 million granted in June 2007, offset in part
by the decline in stock-based compensation expenses from the
$2.3 million recorded in the prior year. We also had
increases in operational headcount, rent for additional leased
office space and a one-time bonus payment to our employees upon
receipt of marketing approval for AMITIZA to treat chronic
idiopathic constipation in adults, as well as professional fees
in connection with our acquisition of the capital stock of
Sucampo Europe and Sucampo Japan.
38
We recorded a cumulative out-of-period adjustment of
approximately $358,000 during the six months ended June 30,
2007 to reduce an overstatement of additional paid-in capital
and general administrative expenses that had been recorded as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2006 in connection with
certain employee stock options awarded in 2006. The error
resulted from applying the incorrect contractual term for
certain employee stock options. The impacts of this adjustment
were not material to the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2006, for the corresponding
interim periods or for the period in which it was recorded, as
the adjustment consisted of insignificant amounts related to
each of the quarterly reporting periods dating back to the
quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Selling
and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses were $7.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to
$4.0 million (restated) for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, an increase of $3.0 million. This
increase was due to incurring selling and marketing expenses,
including costs for market research and analysis, marketing and
promotional materials, product samples and other costs, for six
months in 2007 compared to three months in 2006.
Milestone
Royalties to Related Parties
Milestone royalties to related parties were $1.5 million
and $1.25 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively. These royalties are payable to
Sucampo AG, reflecting the 5% we owed them in respect of the
$30.0 million development milestone earned from Takeda
during that period. The milestone royalties to related parties
of $1.25 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006 were paid to Sucampo AG reflecting the 5% we owed them in
respect of the $20.0 million development milestone payment
we received from Takeda during that period, and a
$250,000 milestone payment for regulatory approval of
AMITIZA.
Product
Royalties to Related Parties
We began to incur product royalty expenses for net sales of
AMITIZA in the second quarter of 2006 following the product
launch of AMITIZA. In the six months ended June 30, 2007,
we expensed $2.1 million in product royalties to related
parties compared to $967,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2006.
Income
Taxes
As required under APB No. 28, we have estimated our annual
effective tax rate for the full fiscal year 2007 and 2006 and
applied that rate to our income before income taxes in
determining our provision for income taxes for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. For the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, our consolidated annualized
effective tax rate was 35.2% and 0%, respectively. The increase
in the annualized effective tax rate for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 from the six months ended June 30, 2006
was due to the utilization of approximately $4.4 million of
U.S. deferred tax assets and an increase in current tax
expense resulting from the income earned in the current period.
The utilization of our U.S. deferred tax assets for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 was offset by a corresponding
release of our valuation allowance, which resulted in a 0%
effective tax rate. As of June 30, 2007, our remaining
valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets
was $8.6 million.
39
Reportable
Geographic Segments
We have determined that we have three reportable geographic
segments based on our method of internal reporting, which
disaggregates business by geographic location. These segments
are the United States, Europe and Japan. We evaluate the
performance of these segments on the basis of income from
operations. The following is a summary of financial information
by reportable segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
48,924
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
(210
|
)
|
|
$
|
48,934
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
21,478
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,859
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
21,957
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,372
|
|
Identifiable assets (end of period)
|
|
|
91,613
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
(4,898
|
)
|
|
|
89,091
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
15,432
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,432
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
3,579
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
61,874
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
441
|
|
|
$
|
(420
|
)
|
|
$
|
61,895
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
22,202
|
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,398
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
22,998
|
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,229
|
|
Identifiable assets (end of period)
|
|
|
91,613
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
(4,898
|
)
|
|
|
89,091
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues (restated)
|
|
$
|
38,071
|
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,600
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
(restated)
|
|
|
14,463
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,633
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
(restated)
|
|
|
15,455
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16,782
|
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Sources
of Liquidity
We require cash principally to meet our operating expenses. We
have financed our operations since inception with a combination
of private placements of equity securities, up-front and
milestone payments received from Takeda and R-Tech Ueno, Ltd.,
or R-Tech, an affiliate, and research and development expense
reimbursements from Takeda. From inception through June 30,
2007, we had raised net proceeds of $55.3 million from
private equity financings. From inception through June 30,
2007, we had also received an aggregate of $110.5 million
in up-front, milestone, option and expense reimbursement
payments from third parties. We operated profitably in the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, principally as a
result of the development milestones and product royalties that
we earned from Takeda. As of June 30, 2007, we had cash and
cash equivalents and short-term investments of
$37.0 million.
40
Cash
Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(12,824
|
)
|
|
$
|
(548
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(1,321
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
19,018
|
|
Effect of exchange rates
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(14,846
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
months ended June 30, 2007
Net cash used in operating activities was $12.8 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2007. This reflected net
income of $14.4 million offset by an increase in accounts
receivable of $38.9 million and a decrease in deferred
revenue of $11.2 million. The decrease in deferred revenue
primarily related to the amortization of deferred research and
development revenue over the performance period of the
development of AMITIZA.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2007. This primarily
reflected our purchases of property and equipment associated
with the move of our offices in the United States. The
relocation of our headquarters occurred in July 2007.
Net cash used in financing activities was $632,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. This reflected payments
incurred for our initial public offering which was consummated
in August 2007.
Six
months ended June 30, 2006
Net cash used in operating activities was $548,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2006. This reflected net income of
$16.8 million (restated), which included a non-cash charge
of $2.6 million of stock-based compensation expense. We
also had an increase in accounts receivable of
$6.2 million, primarily related to product royalty revenue
for AMITIZA and co-promotion revenues from Takeda, and a
decrease in deferred revenue of $12.5 million (restated).
The decrease in deferred revenue primarily related to the
amortization of deferred research and development revenue over
the performance period of the development of AMITIZA.
Net cash used in investing activities was $189,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2006. This reflected our purchases of
auction rate securities and property and equipment, offset in
part by proceeds received from sales and maturities of auction
rate securities.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $19.0 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006. This reflected
$23.9 million in net proceeds raised in a private placement
sale of 2,398,759 shares of class A common stock,
$1.2 million in funds received from borrowings under
related party debt instruments, $1.3 million of payments
incurred for our completed initial public offering and
$4.8 million of repayments under related party debt
instruments.
41
Commitments
and Contingencies
As of June 30, 2007, our principal outstanding contractual
obligations related to our office leases in Bethesda, Maryland,
England and Japan. The following table summarizes these
significant contractual obligations as of June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Contractual
obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
$
|
479
|
|
|
$
|
1,429
|
|
|
$
|
1,321
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
5,159
|
|
|
$
|
10,295
|
|
The above table does not include:
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent milestone and royalty obligations under our license
agreement with Sucampo AG. These obligations are described in
more detail above, and include obligations to pay Sucampo AG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% of every milestone payment we receive from a sublicensee;
|
|
|
|
$500,000 upon initiation of the first Phase II clinical
trial for each compound in each of the three territories covered
by the license;
|
|
|
|
$1.0 million for the first NDA filing or comparable foreign
regulatory filing for each compound in each of these three
territories; and
|
|
|
|
royalty payments ranging from 2.1% to 6.5% of net sales of
products covered by patents licensed to us by Sucampo AG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses under agreements with contract research organizations
for clinical trials of our product candidates. The timing and
amount of these disbursements are based on a variety of factors,
such as the achievement of specified milestones, patient
enrollment, services rendered or the incurrence of expenses by
the contract research organization. As a result, we must
reasonably estimate the potential timing and amount of these
payments. We estimate our current commitments to contract
research organizations at June 30, 2007 to be
$2.7 million for the six months ending December 31,
2007 and $1.2 million for the year ending December 31,
2008.
|
In addition, the FDA has required us to perform two
post-marketing studies to evaluate the safety of AMITIZA in
patients with renal impairment and patients with hepatic
impairment. Under our collaboration agreement with Takeda, the
costs for these studies will be shared 70% by Takeda and 30% by
us. We do not anticipate our portion of these expenses will
exceed $5.0 million.
Funding
Requirements
In addition to our normal operating expenses, we estimate that
our specific funding requirements through the first half of 2008
will include:
|
|
|
|
|
Up to $1.0 million to fund our 30% share of the two
post-marketing studies of AMITIZA to evaluate its safety in
patients with renal impairment and patients with hepatic
impairment. We initiated these studies in January 2007.
|
|
|
|
Approximately $18.0 million to fund development and
regulatory activities for SPI-8811 and SPI-017, which we expect
will enable us to substantially complete at least the following
development efforts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Phase II clinical trial of SPI-8811 for the prevention
and treatment of NSAID-induced ulcers, which we plan to commence
by the third quarter of 2007;
|
|
|
|
a Phase II proof-of-concept study of SPI-8811 in patients
with portal hypertension, which we plan to commence in the
fourth quarter of 2007;
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
a Phase II clinical trial of SPI-8811 in patients with
cystic fibrosis, which we plan to commence by the second quarter
of 2008; and
|
|
|
|
Phase I clinical trials of an intravenous formulation of SPI-017
for peripheral arterial and vascular disease and stroke, which
we plan to commence in 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to $12.0 million to fund the expansion of our
commercialization activities in the United States and the
initiation of commercialization efforts in
non-U.S. markets;
|
|
|
|
Up to $1.0 million to fund regulatory efforts by Sucampo
Europe and Sucampo Japan for AMITIZA and SPI-8811;
|
|
|
|
Up to $6.0 million for research and development activities
for prostone compounds other than AMITIZA, SPI-8811 and SPI-017;
and
|
|
|
|
Up to $1.0 million to fund costs in connection with
computers, software and information technology to support growth
in our business.
|
Takeda will fund 100% of the Phase IV clinical trials
of AMITIZA for the treatment of Constipation in pediatric
patients that we initiated in January 2007.
We believe that the net proceeds from our initial public
offering, together with our existing cash and cash equivalents
and internally generated funds from AMITIZA product sales, will
be sufficient to enable us to fund our operating expenses for
the next twelve months. We have based this estimate on
assumptions that may prove to be wrong. There are numerous risks
and uncertainties associated with AMITIZA product sales and with
the development and commercialization of our product candidates.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of AMITIZA product sales;
|
|
|
|
the scope, progress, results and costs of preclinical
development and laboratory testing and clinical trials for our
product candidates;
|
|
|
|
the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our
product candidates;
|
|
|
|
the number and development requirements of other product
candidates that we pursue;
|
|
|
|
the costs of commercialization activities, including product
marketing, sales and distribution;
|
|
|
|
the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent
applications and maintaining, enforcing and defending
intellectual property-related claims;
|
|
|
|
the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products
and technologies;
|
|
|
|
our ability to establish and maintain collaborations, such as
our collaboration with Takeda; and
|
|
|
|
changes in our business plan as a result of changes in the
market conditions resulting from withdrawal or approval of
competing products, such as recently occurred when Novartis
withdrew Zelnorm from the U.S. market.
|
In particular, we could require external sources of funds for
acquisitions that we determine to make in the future.
To the extent that our capital resources are insufficient to
meet our future capital requirements, we will need to finance
our future cash needs through public or private equity
offerings, debt financings or corporate collaboration and
licensing arrangements. Except for development funding by
Takeda, we do not currently have any commitments for future
external funding.
Additional equity or debt financing, grants or corporate
collaboration and licensing arrangements may not be available on
acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not
available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or
eliminate our research and development programs, reduce our
planned commercialization efforts or obtain funds through
arrangements with collaborators or others that may require us to
relinquish rights to certain
43
product candidates that we might otherwise seek to develop or
commercialize independently. In addition, any future equity
funding may dilute the ownership of our equity investors.
Effects
of Inflation
Our most liquid assets are cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments. Because of their liquidity, these assets are not
directly affected by inflation. We also believe that we have
intangible assets in the value of our intellectual property. In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we
have not capitalized the value of this intellectual property on
our balance sheets. Due to the nature of this intellectual
property, we believe that these intangible assets are not
affected by inflation. Because we intend to retain and continue
to use our equipment, furniture and fixtures and leasehold
improvements, we believe that the incremental inflation related
to replacement costs of such items will not materially affect
our operations. However, the rate of inflation affects our
expenses, such as those for employee compensation and contract
services, which could increase our level of expenses and the
rate at which we use our resources.
Effects
of Foreign Currency
We currently incur a portion of our operating expenses in the
United Kingdom and Japan. The reporting currency for our
condensed consolidated financial statements is
U.S. Dollars. As such, our results of operations could be
adversely effected by changes in exchange rates either due to
transaction losses, which are recognized in the statement of
operations, or translation losses, which are recognized in
comprehensive income. We currently do not hedge foreign exchange
rate exposure.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities.
Accounting
Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB Staff issued FASB Statement
No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities, or SFAS 159,
which provides entities with the opportunity to measure certain
financial instruments at fair value. We will be required to
adopt SFAS 159 for the year beginning January 1, 2008.
We are assessing SFAS 159 and its impact on our future
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF
No. 07-3,
Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods
or Services to Be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities, or
EITF 07-3,
which provides guidance to research and development companies on
how to account for the nonrefundable portion of an advance
payment made for research and development activities. We will be
required to adopt
EITF 07-3
for the year beginning after December 15, 2007. We are
currently assessing
EITF 07-3
and do not expect a material impact on our future condensed
consolidated financial statements upon its adoption.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Our international sales generally are denominated in United
States Dollars, and are, therefore, not exposed to changes in
foreign currency exchange rates.
We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. However, we regularly invest excess cash
in overnight repurchase agreements that are subject to changes
in short-term interest rates. We believe that the market risk
arising from holding these financial instruments is minimal.
Our exposure to market risks associated with changes in interest
rates relates primarily to the increase or decrease in the
amount of interest income earned on our investment portfolio
since we have minimal debt. We ensure the safety and
preservation of invested funds by limiting default risks, market
risk and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by
investing in investment grade securities. A hypothetical
100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the
entire interest rate yield curve would not have materially
affected the fair value of our interest sensitive financial
instruments as of June 30, 2007.
44
|
|
Item 4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of
June 30, 2007, the end of the period covered by this report
on
Form 10-Q.
This evaluation was done under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including our Chief Executive
Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO.
Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other
procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act, such as this report on
Form 10-Q,
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls
and procedures designed such that information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Based upon the controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have
concluded that as of June 30, 2007, our disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in our
Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the SEC and to
ensure that material information relating to our company and our
consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including
the CEO and CFO, particularly during the period when our
periodic reports are being prepared.
In connection with the acquisition of Sucampo Europe and Sucampo
Japan and our preparation of audited financial information for
those two entities for the year ended December 31, 2005, we
identified control deficiencies relative to those entities that
constitute material weaknesses in the design and operation of
our internal control over financial reporting.
In general, a material weakness is defined as a control
deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results
in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of
annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected. The material weakness we identified is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
We did not maintain effective controls over the preparation,
review and presentation of the financial information prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles reflecting Sucampo Europe and Sucampo Japan
operations. Specifically, effective controls were not designed
and in place to adequately review, analyze and monitor these
affiliates financial information, nor did we have a
standard reporting format for these affiliates, accounting
procedures and policies manuals, formally documented controls
and procedures or a formal process to review and analyze
financial information of these affiliates. This control
deficiency resulted in adjustments to revenue, deferred revenue,
accounts payable, accrued expenses, other liabilities and notes
payable accounts, as well as the statement of cash flows.
Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a
misstatement in a number of our financial statement accounts,
including the statement of cash flows, resulting in a material
misstatement to our interim or annual financial statements that
would not be prevented or detected.
|
Sucampo Europe and Sucampo Japan collectively accounted for
0.03% of our total revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 3.9% of our total revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2006.
We have not yet fully remediated the material weaknesses in the
area of effective controls over the preparation, review and
presentation of financial information prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
reflecting Sucampo Europes and Sucampo Japans
operations. If we are unable to remediate this material
weakness, we may not be able to accurately and timely report our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows as a
public company.
The process of improving our internal controls has required and
will continue to require us to expend significant resources to
design, implement and maintain a system of internal controls
that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a
public company. There can be no assurance that any actions we
take will be successful.
45
We will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting on an on-going basis.
b) Changes
in Internal Controls
No change in our internal control over financial reporting
occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2007 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Internal
control over financial reporting means a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Part II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings the
negative outcome of which would have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report,
the following factors should be considered carefully in
evaluating our business and us.
Risks
Related to Our Limited Commercial Operations
We
have historically incurred significant losses and we might not
achieve or maintain operating profitability.
We initiated commercial sales of our first product, AMITIZA, for
the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults in
April 2006, and we first generated product royalty revenue in
the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Since our formation, we
have incurred significant operating losses and, as of
June 30, 2007, we had an accumulated deficit of
$9.0 million. Although we had net income of
$16.8 million in the first half of 2006 and
$14.4 million in the first half of 2007, this was primarily
attributable to our development milestones of $20.0 million
and $30.0 million earned in 2006 and in 2007, respectively,
which we recognized as revenue over the development period,
which was completed in June 2007. Our historical losses have
resulted principally from costs incurred in our research and
development programs and from our general and administrative
expenses. We expect to continue to incur significant and
increasing expenses for at least the next several years as we
continue our research activities and conduct development of, and
seek regulatory approvals for, additional indications for
AMITIZA and for other drug candidates. Under our collaboration
agreement with Takeda, Takeda reimbursed us for the first
$30.0 million in research and development expenses we
incurred related to AMITIZA for the treatment of chronic
idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with
constipation, and we are responsible for the next
$20.0 million. Takedas reimbursement obligation
covered substantially all of our research and development
expenses for AMITIZA through 2005, by which time Takeda had
satisfied its full $30.0 million reimbursement obligation.
Accordingly, the unreimbursed portion of our research and
development expenses increased significantly in 2006 and the
first half of 2007. Whether we are able to achieve operating
profitability in the future will depend upon our ability to
generate revenues that exceed our expenses. Changes in market
conditions, including the failure or approval of competing
products, may require us to incur more expenses or change the
timing of expenses such that we may incur unexpected losses.
Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to
sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual
basis. If we are unable to achieve and maintain profitability,
the market value of our class A common stock will decline
and you could lose all or a part of your investment.
46
If we
are unable to successfully commercialize our first product,
AMITIZA, for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in
adults or other indications for which we are developing this
drug, including irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, or
experience significant delays in doing so, our ability to
generate product-based revenues and achieve profitability will
be jeopardized.
In the near term, our ability to generate product-based revenues
will depend on the successful commercialization and continued
development of AMITIZA. We recorded our first product royalty
revenue from AMITIZA in the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
The commercial success of AMITIZA will depend on several
factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of Takedas sales force, as supplemented
by our internal specialty sales force, in marketing and selling
AMITIZA in the United States for the treatment of chronic
idiopathic constipation in adults;
|
|
|
|
the ability of R-Tech, which has the exclusive right to
manufacture and supply AMITIZA, or any substitute manufacturer
to supply quantities sufficient to meet market demand and at
acceptable levels of quality and price;
|
|
|
|
acceptance of the product within the medical community and by
third-party payors;
|
|
|
|
successful completion of clinical trials of AMITIZA for the
treatment of other constipation-related gastrointestinal
indications beyond chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable
bowel syndrome with constipation, and acceptance of the results
of these trials by regulatory authorities; and
|
|
|
|
receipt of marketing approvals from the FDA and similar foreign
regulatory authorities for the treatment of other indications,
including marketing approval in the United States for AMITIZA to
treat irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.
|
If we are not successful in commercializing AMITIZA for the
treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation or other
indications, or are significantly delayed in doing so, our
business will be materially harmed.
We
have limited experience commercializing drug products. If we are
not successful in making the transition from a pre-commercial
stage company to a commercial company, our ability to become
profitable will be compromised.
For most of our operating history, we have been a pre-commercial
stage company. We are in the process of transitioning to a
company capable of supporting commercial activities, and we may
not be successful in accomplishing this transition. Our
operations to date have been limited largely to organizing and
staffing our company, developing prostone technology,
undertaking preclinical and clinical trials of our product
candidates and coordinating the U.S. regulatory approval
process for AMITIZA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic
constipation in adults. To make the transition to a commercial
company, we will need to continue to develop internally, or
contract with third parties to provide us with, the capabilities
to manufacture a commercial scale product and to conduct the
sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product
commercialization. While we are currently utilizing R-Tech to
perform these manufacturing functions and Takeda to perform many
of these sales and marketing functions with respect to the sale
of AMITIZA in the United States, we may nevertheless encounter
unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications and delays as
we establish these commercial functions for AMITIZA and for
other products for which we may receive regulatory marketing
approval. As we continue to develop and seek regulatory approval
of additional product candidates and additional indications for
AMITIZA, and to pursue regulatory approvals for AMITIZA and
other products outside the United States, it could be difficult
for us to obtain and devote the resources necessary to
successfully manage our commercialization efforts. If we are not
successful in completing our transition to a commercial company,
our ability to become profitable will be jeopardized and the
market price of our class A common stock is likely to
decline.
47
Risks
Related to Employees and Managing Growth
If we
are unable to retain our chief executive and chief scientific
officer and other key executives, we may not be able to
successfully develop and commercialize our products,
particularly in light of the recent resignation of our president
and chair of our board of directors.
We are highly dependent on Dr. Ryuji Ueno, our chief
executive officer and chief scientific officer, and the other
principal members of our executive and scientific teams,
including Ronald Kaiser, our chief financial officer, Mariam
Morris, our chief accounting officer, Brad Fackler, our
executive vice president of commercial operations, Gayle
Dolecek, our senior vice president of research and development,
Kei Tolliver, our vice president of business development and
company operations, and Charles Hrushka, our vice president of
marketing. The loss of the services of any of these persons
might impede the achievement of our product development and
commercialization objectives and it might be difficult to
recruit a replacement executive for any of their positions. We
have employment agreements with these executives, but these
agreements are terminable by the employees on short or no notice
at any time without penalty to the employee. We do not maintain
key-man life insurance on any of our executives.
Dr. Sachiko Kuno, who had been serving as our president and
chair of our board of directors, resigned as an executive
officer and director of our company effective May 31, 2007.
Although we expect that Dr. Kuno will continue to work for
our company as a part-time employee, many of her duties will
need to be assumed by our existing senior executives until we
are able to identify and hire one or more additional senior
executives to take her place. This could distract our senior
management from their existing responsibilities and compromise
our ability to effectively manage our company.
If we
fail to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, we may
not be able to pursue our product development and
commercialization programs.
Recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and commercial
personnel, including clinical development, regulatory, and
marketing and sales executives and field personnel, will be
critical to our success. If we fail to recruit and then retain
these personnel, our ability to pursue our clinical development
and product commercialization programs will be compromised. We
may not be able to attract and retain these personnel on
acceptable terms given the competition among numerous
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for similar
personnel. We also experience competition for the hiring of
scientific personnel from universities and research institutions.
We
expect to expand our development, regulatory, sales and
marketing, and finance and accounting capabilities, and as a
result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth,
which could disrupt our operations.
We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our
employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the
areas of drug development, regulatory affairs, sales and
marketing and finance and accounting. To manage our anticipated
future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our
managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our
facilities, and continue to recruit and train additional
qualified personnel. Due to our limited resources, we may not be
able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or
recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion
of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert
our management and business development resources. The
challenges of managing our growth will become more significant
as we expand the operations of Sucampo Europe and Sucampo Japan.
Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our
business plans or disrupt our operations.
The
requirements of being a public company may strain our resources
and distract management.
As a public company, we will incur significant legal,
accounting, corporate governance and other expenses that we did
not incur as a private company. We will be subject to the
requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley, The NASDAQ Global Market, and other
rules and regulations. These rules and regulations may place a
strain on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires,
among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current
reports with respect to our business and financial condition.
Sarbanes-Oxley requires, among other things, that we maintain
effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal
48
control over financial reporting. We currently do not have an
internal audit group. In order to maintain and improve the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and
internal controls over financial reporting, we will need to
devote significant resources and management oversight. As a
result, managements attention may be diverted from other
business concerns. In addition, we will need to hire additional
accounting staff with appropriate public company experience and
technical accounting knowledge and we cannot assure you that we
will be able to do so in a timely fashion.
These rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more
expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability
insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits
and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the
same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult
for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on
our board of directors or as executive officers. We are
currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to
these rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of
additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.
Risks
Related to Product Development and Commercialization
Commercial
rights to some prostone compounds will revert back to Sucampo AG
in the future unless we devote sufficient development resources
to those compounds during the next several years; if any of the
compounds that revert back to Sucampo AG subsequently become
valuable compounds, we will have lost the commercial rights to
those compounds and will not be able to develop or market them,
and the reverted compounds could ultimately compete with
compounds we are developing or marketing.
Sucampo AG has granted to us an exclusive worldwide license to
develop and commercialize products based upon Sucampo AGs
extensive portfolio of U.S. and foreign patents and patent
applications relating to prostone technology. To retain our
license rights to any prostone compounds other than AMITIZA,
SPI-8811 and SPI-017, which are perpetual, we are required to
perform preclinical testing over a specified period on those
compounds and to generate specified pharmacological and toxicity
data. The specified period ends on the later of June 30,
2011 or the date upon which Drs. Kuno and Ueno no longer
control our company. Following the end of the specified period,
Sucampo AG can terminate our license with respect to any
compounds as to which we have not performed the required
testing, except for any compounds we designate as compounds for
which we intend in good faith to perform the required testing
within 15 months following the expiration of the specified
period. At the end of that
15-month
period, Sucampo AG may terminate our license as to any of the
designated compounds for which we have not performed the
required testing.
We will need to focus our development resources and funding on a
limited number of compounds during the specified period. The
decision whether to commit development resources to a particular
compound will require us to determine which compounds have the
greatest likelihood of commercial success. Dr. Ueno and his
staff will be primarily responsible for making these decisions
on our behalf. Dr. Ueno and his wife, Dr. Kuno,
indirectly own all the stock of Sucampo AG. In this process, we
will likely commit resources to some compounds that do not prove
to be commercially feasible and we may overlook other compounds
that later prove to have significant commercial potential. If we
do not identify and commit resources to one of these valuable
compounds, the commercial rights with respect to the compound
will eventually revert back to Sucampo AG. After the reversion
of these rights to Sucampo AG, we will have no ability to
develop or commercialize the compound. Although Sucampo AG will
be prohibited from developing products that compete with our
products prior to the end of the specified period, thereafter
they will be free to develop competitive products. In addition,
although Sucampo AG will be prohibited from marketing products
that compete with our products for 24 months after the end
of the specified period, after that date Sucampo AG will be
permitted to market products, including products covered by the
reverted license rights, in competition with us.
If our
preclinical studies do not produce successful results or if our
clinical trials do not demonstrate safety and efficacy in
humans, our ability to develop additional indications for
AMITIZA and to develop and commercialize other product
candidates will be impaired.
Before obtaining regulatory approval for the sale of our product
candidates, we must conduct extensive preclinical tests and
clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy in humans
of our product candidates.
49
Preclinical and clinical testing is expensive, is difficult to
design and implement, can take many years to complete and is
uncertain as to outcome. Success in preclinical testing and
early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials
will be successful, and interim results of a clinical trial do
not necessarily predict final results. A failure of one or more
of our clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. We may
experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of,
preclinical testing and the clinical trial process that could
delay or prevent our ability to receive regulatory approval or
commercialize our product candidates, including:
|
|
|
|
|
regulators or institutional review boards may not authorize us
to commence a clinical trial or conduct a clinical trial at a
prospective trial site;
|
|
|
|
our preclinical tests or clinical trials may produce negative or
inconclusive results, and as a result we may decide, or
regulators may require us, to conduct additional preclinical
testing or clinical trials or we may abandon projects that we
consider to be promising. For example, the efficacy results in
two of our Phase II trials of SPI-8811, specifically the
trials for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
and for the treatment of symptoms associated with cystic
fibrosis, were inconclusive. Therefore, further clinical testing
will be required in connection with the development of this
compound for these indications;
|
|
|
|
design of or enrollment in our clinical trials may be slower
than we currently anticipate, resulting in significant delays,
or participants may drop out of our clinical trials at rates
that are higher than we currently anticipate;
|
|
|
|
we might have to suspend or terminate our clinical trials, or
perform additional trials, if we discover that the participating
patients are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;
|
|
|
|
regulators or institutional review boards may require that we
hold, suspend or terminate clinical research for various
reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
the cost of our clinical trials may be greater than we currently
anticipate;
|
|
|
|
we might have difficulty obtaining sufficient quantities of the
product candidate being tested to complete our clinical trials;
|
|
|
|
any regulatory approval we ultimately obtain may be limited or
subject to restrictions or post-approval commitments that render
the product not commercially viable; and
|
|
|
|
the effects of our product candidates may not be the desired or
anticipated effects or may include undesirable side effects, or
the product candidates may have other unexpected
characteristics. For example, in preclinical tests of AMITIZA,
the drug demonstrated a potential to cause fetal loss in guinea
pigs and, as a result, its label includes cautionary language as
to its use by pregnant women.
|
If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or
other testing of our product candidates beyond those that we
currently contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete
our clinical trials or other testing or if the results of these
trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive,
we may:
|
|
|
|
|
be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product
candidates;
|
|
|
|
not be able to obtain marketing approval; or
|
|
|
|
obtain approval for indications that are not as broad as those
for which we apply.
|
Our product development costs will also increase if we
experience delays in testing or approvals. We do not know
whether our clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to
be restructured or will be completed on schedule, if at all.
Significant clinical trial delays also could allow our
competitors to bring products to market before we do and impair
our ability to commercialize our products or product candidates.
50
We are
required to conduct supplemental post-marketing clinical trials
of AMITIZA and we may elect to perform additional clinical
trials for other indications or in support of applications for
regulatory marketing approval in jurisdictions outside the
United States. These supplemental trials could be costly and
could result in findings inconsistent with or contrary to our
historic U.S. clinical trials.
In connection with our marketing approval for AMITIZA for the
treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults, we
committed to the FDA to conduct post-marketing studies of the
product in pediatric patients, in patients with renal impairment
and in patients with hepatic impairment. In the future, we may
be required, or we may elect, to conduct additional clinical
trials of AMITIZA. In addition, if we seek marketing approval
from regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside the United
States, such as the European Medicines Agency, or EMEA, they may
require us to submit data from supplemental clinical trials in
addition to data from the clinical trials that supported our
U.S. filings with the FDA. Any requirements to conduct
supplemental trials would add to the cost of developing our
product candidates. Additional or supplemental trials could also
produce findings that are inconsistent with the trial results we
have previously submitted to the FDA, in which case we would be
obligated to report those findings to the FDA. This could result
in new restrictions on AMITIZAs existing marketing
approval for chronic idiopathic constipation in adults or could
force us to stop selling AMITIZA altogether. Inconsistent trial
results could also lead to delays in obtaining marketing
approval in the United States for other indications for AMITIZA
or for other product candidates, could cause regulators to
impose restrictive conditions on marketing approvals and could
even make it impossible for us to obtain marketing approval. Any
of these results could materially impair our ability to generate
revenues and to achieve or maintain profitability.
If we
are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or
successfully use third parties to market and sell our products,
we may be unable to generate sufficient product revenues to
become profitable.
We currently have limited sales and distribution capabilities
and little experience in marketing and selling pharmaceutical
products. To achieve commercial success for AMITIZA and any
other approved products, we must either further develop a sales
and marketing organization and/or outsource these functions to
third parties. There are risks associated with either of these
alternatives. For example, developing or expanding a sales force
can be expensive and time consuming and could delay any product
launch. If the commercial launch of a product for which we
recruit a sales force and establish marketing capabilities were
delayed, we would incur related expenses too early relative to
the product launch. This may be costly, and our investment would
be lost if we could not retain our sales and marketing personnel.
We have entered into a joint collaboration and license agreement
with Takeda for the commercialization of AMITIZA for
gastrointestinal indications in the United States and Canada.
Takeda will broadly market AMITIZA for the treatment of chronic
idiopathic constipation in adults and for other
constipation-related gastrointestinal indications, if approved,
to office-based specialty physicians and primary care physicians
in the United States. The Takeda sales force dedicated to
selling AMITIZA will be significantly larger than our contract
sales force, and we will therefore be heavily dependent on the
marketing and sales efforts of Takeda. If our contract specialty
sales force is not effective, or if Takeda is less successful in
selling AMITIZA than we anticipate, our ability to generate
revenues and achieve profitability will be significantly
compromised.
Prior to July 1, 2007, we utilized Ventiv Commercial
Services, LLC, or Ventiv, to provide us with a contract
specialty sales force to market AMITIZA to hospital-based
specialist physicians and long-term care facilities. We
terminated our agreement with Ventiv effective July 1, 2007
and we have internalized a significant portion of their sales
staff as employees of our company and recruited the remainder
from other pharmaceutical sales forces. This internalization
effort may not succeed and our ability to generate revenues and
profits may be adversely affected.
We
face substantial competition which may result in others
discovering, developing or commercializing products earlier or
more successfully than we do.
The development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products
is highly competitive. We expect to face intense competition
with respect to AMITIZA and our other product candidates from
major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical
companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. Potential
competitors also include academic institutions, government
agencies, and other public and private research organizations
that
51
conduct research, seek patent protection and establish
collaborative arrangements for research, development,
manufacturing and commercialization. Our competitors may develop
products that are safer, more effective, have fewer side
effects, are more convenient or are less costly than AMITIZA or
the other product candidates that we are developing or that
would render AMITIZA or our other product candidates obsolete or
uncompetitive. Our competitors may also obtain FDA or other
regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we may
obtain approval for ours or achieve product commercialization
before we do. A competitive product might become more popular if
it is approved for sale over the counter. If any of our
competitors develops a product that is more effective, safer or
more convenient for patients, or is able to obtain FDA approval
for commercialization before we do, we may not be able to
achieve market acceptance for our products, which would impair
our ability to generate revenues and recover the substantial
developments costs we have incurred and will continue to incur.
There are currently approved therapies for the diseases and
conditions addressed by AMITIZA. For example,
Zelnorm®,
which is marketed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, has
been approved both for the treatment of chronic idiopathic
constipation in adults under 65 years of age and for the
short-term treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with
constipation in women. In March 2007, Zelnorm was withdrawn from
the U.S. market by Novartis at the request of the FDA, but
may continue to be sold in other countries and may be acquired
for use by individuals in the United States and in other
markets. In July 2007, Zelnorm was granted a limited treatment
investigational new drug, or IND, by the FDA, allowing for
restricted use of Zelnorm by certain patients. We expect a
minimal impact on AMITIZA business as a result of this IND.
Zelnorm may be re-introduced to the U.S. and other markets
for a more general distribution at a later date. In addition,
the osmotic laxatives
MiraLaxtm
(polyethylene glycol 3350), which is marketed by Braintree
Laboratories, Inc., and lactulose, which is produced by Solvay
S.A., have each been approved for the short-term treatment of
occasional constipation. Miralax was recently approved for sale
as an over-the-counter treatment.
Several companies also are working to develop new drugs and
other therapies for these same diseases and conditions. Some of
these potential competitive drug products include:
|
|
|
|
|
Drugs targeting serotonin receptors for the treatment of
irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, such as Renzapride,
being developed by Alizyme plc and currently in Phase III
clinical trials, and DDP733, being developed by Dynogen
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and currently in Phase II clinical
trials;
|
|
|
|
Opioid antagonists such as methylnaltrexone, being developed by
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., for the treatment of
opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Progenics and its partner
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals recently filed an NDA with the FDA for a
subcutaneous formulation of this drug for the treatment of
opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in patients receiving
palliative care; and
|
|
|
|
TD-5108, being developed by Theravance, Inc. for the treatment
of chronic constipation, and linaclotide, being developed by
Microbia, Inc. for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome
with constipation, both of which have recently completed
phase II clinical trials.
|
Many patients are treated for chronic idiopathic constipation
with competing over-the-counter products that are sold for
occasional or infrequent use or for recurring use and that are
directly competitive with our products.
We face similar competition from approved therapies and
potential drug products for the diseases and conditions
addressed by SPI-8811 and SPI-017, and are likely to face
significant competition for any other product candidates we may
elect to develop in the future.
Many of our competitors may have significantly greater financial
resources and expertise in research and development,
manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials,
obtaining regulatory approvals, and marketing approved products
than we do. Smaller or early stage companies may also prove to
be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative
arrangements with large and established companies.
52
The
commercial success of AMITIZA and any other products that we may
develop will depend upon the degree of market acceptance by
physicians, patients, healthcare payors and others in the
medical community.
AMITIZA and any other products that we bring to the market may
not gain acceptance by physicians, patients, healthcare payors
and others in the medical community. If these products do not
achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate
sufficient product revenues to become profitable. The degree of
market acceptance of AMITIZA and any other products approved for
commercial sale will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the prevalence and severity of any side effects. For example,
the most common side effects reported by participants in our
clinical trials of AMITIZA for the treatment of chronic
idiopathic constipation were nausea, which was reported by 31%
of trial participants, and diarrhea and headache, both of which
were reported by 13% of trial participants;
|
|
|
|
the efficacy and potential advantages over alternative
treatments;
|
|
|
|
the competitiveness of the pricing of our products;
|
|
|
|
the relative convenience and ease of administration of our
products compared with other alternatives;
|
|
|
|
the timing of the release of our products to the public compared
to alternative products or treatments;
|
|
|
|
the willingness of the target patient population to try new
therapies and of physicians to prescribe these therapies;
the strength of marketing and distribution support; and
|
|
|
|
the level of third-party coverage or reimbursement.
|
The recent withdrawal of Zelnorm from the U.S. market might
adversely affect market acceptance of AMITIZA. The FDA requested
that Novartis discontinue marketing Zelnorm based on a recently
identified finding of an increased risk of serious
cardiovascular adverse events associated with use of the drug.
Although the mechanism of action of AMITIZA is different from
that of Zelnorm, and although AMITIZA has not been associated
with serious adverse cardiovascular events, nonetheless the
withdrawal of Zelnorm may result in heightened concerns in the
minds of some patients or physicians about the safety of using
alternative treatments such as AMITIZA.
In addition, Adolor Corporation, the developer of an opioid
antagonist,
Entereg®
(alvimopan), for the treatment of opioid-induced bowel
dysfunction, recently announced that it was withdrawing its
protocol for an additional Phase III clinical trial of
Entereg to treat this condition, which had previously been filed
with the FDA. This decision was reportedly based upon
preliminary Phase III trial safety results that suggest
potential links between use of Entereg and adverse
cardiovascular events, tumor development and bone fractures. It
is possible that this development, coming so shortly after the
withdrawal of Zelnorm, could further confuse patients and
physicians and lead to reluctance on their part to use and to
prescribe new drugs to treat gastrointestinal conditions, even
those with different mechanisms of action such as AMITIZA.
If we
are unable to obtain adequate reimbursement from third-party
payors for AMITIZA and any other products that we may develop,
or acceptable prices for those products, our revenues and
prospects for profitability will suffer.
Our revenues and ability to become profitable will depend
heavily upon the availability of adequate reimbursement for the
use of our products from governmental and other third party
payors, both in the United States and in foreign markets.
Reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend upon a number of
factors, including the third-party payors determination
that use of a product is:
|
|
|
|
|
a covered benefit under its health plan;
|
|
|
|
safe, effective and medically necessary;
|
|
|
|
appropriate for the specific patient;
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
cost effective; and
|
|
|
|
neither experimental nor investigational.
|
Obtaining reimbursement approval for a product from each
government or other third-party payor is a time-consuming and
costly process that could require us to provide supporting
scientific, clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the use of
our products to each payor. We may not be able to provide data
sufficient to gain acceptance with respect to reimbursement.
Even when a payor determines that a product is eligible for
reimbursement, the payor may impose coverage limitations that
preclude payment for some product uses that are approved by the
FDA or comparable authorities. Moreover, eligibility for
coverage does not imply that any product will be reimbursed in
all cases or at a rate that allows us to make a profit or even
cover our costs. If we are not able to obtain coverage and
profitable reimbursement promptly from government-funded and
private third-party payors for our products, our ability to
generate revenues and become profitable will be compromised.
Recent
federal legislation will increase the pressure to reduce prices
of prescription drugs paid for by Medicare, which could limit
our ability to generate revenues.
In 2003, the United States government enacted legislation
providing a partial prescription drug benefit for Medicare
recipients, which became effective at the beginning of 2006.
Government payment for some of the costs of prescription drugs
may increase demand for any products for which we receive
marketing approval. However, to obtain payments under this
program, we will be required to sell products to Medicare
recipients through drug procurement organizations operating
pursuant to this legislation. These organizations will negotiate
prices for our products, which are likely to be lower than those
we might otherwise obtain. Federal, state and local governments
in the United States continue to consider legislation to limit
the growth of healthcare costs, including the cost of
prescription drugs. Future legislation could limit payments for
pharmaceuticals such as AMITIZA and the other product candidates
that we are developing.
Legislation
has been proposed from time to time that would permit
re-importation of drugs from foreign countries into the United
States, including foreign countries where the drugs are sold at
lower prices than in the United States, which could force us to
lower the prices at which we sell our products and impair our
ability to derive revenues from these products.
Legislation has been introduced from time to time in the
U.S. Congress that would permit more widespread
re-importation of drugs from foreign countries into the United
States. This could include re-importation from foreign countries
where the drugs are sold at lower prices than in the United
States. Such legislation, or similar regulatory changes, could
lead to a decrease in the price we receive for any approved
products, which, in turn, could impair our ability to generate
revenues. Alternatively, in response to legislation such as
this, we might elect not to seek approval for or market our
products in foreign jurisdictions in order to minimize the risk
of re-importation, which could also reduce the revenue we
generate from our product sales.
Foreign
governments tend to impose strict price controls, which may
limit our ability to generate revenues.
In some foreign countries, particularly Japan and the countries
of the European Union, the pricing of prescription
pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these
countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities
can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing
approval for a product. To obtain reimbursement or pricing
approval in some countries, we may be required to conduct a
clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our
products to other available therapies. If reimbursement of our
products is unavailable in particular countries or limited in
scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels,
our ability to generate revenue and profitably distribute
products in these countries could be compromised.
If
product liability lawsuits are brought against us, we may incur
substantial liabilities and may be required to limit
commercialization of any products that we may
develop.
We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure, both
from the testing of our product candidates in human clinical
trials and from the sale of AMITIZA and any other drugs we may
sell in the future. If we cannot
54
successfully defend ourselves against claims that our products
or product candidates caused injuries, we will incur substantial
liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product
liability claims may result in:
|
|
|
|
|
decreased demand for AMITIZA or any other product that we may
develop;
|
|
|
|
injury to our reputation;
|
|
|
|
withdrawal of clinical trial participants;
|
|
|
|
costs to defend the related litigation;
|
|
|
|
substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients;
|
|
|
|
loss of revenue; and
|
|
|
|
the inability to continue to commercialize AMITIZA or to
commercialize any other product that we may develop.
|
We currently have product liability insurance that covers our
clinical trials in adult patients and our commercial sales of
AMITIZA up to an annual aggregate limit of $20.0 million
and that covers our clinical trials of AMITIZA in pediatric
patients up to an annual aggregate limit of $5.0 million,
in each case subject to a per claim deductible. The amount or
scope of our product liability insurance may not be adequate to
cover all liabilities that we may incur. Insurance coverage is
increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance
coverage at a reasonable cost, and we may not be able to obtain
insurance coverage that will be adequate to cover any liability
that may arise. We may not have sufficient resources to pay for
any liabilities resulting from a claim beyond the limits of our
insurance coverage. If we cannot protect against product
liability claims, we or our collaborators may find it difficult
or impossible to commercialize our products.
Our
strategy of generating growth through acquisitions and
in-licenses may not be successful if we are not able to identify
suitable acquisition or licensing candidates, to negotiate the
terms of any such transaction or to successfully manage the
integration of any acquisition.
As part of our business strategy, we intend to pursue strategic
acquisitions and in-licensing opportunities with third parties
to complement our existing product pipeline. We have no
experience in completing acquisitions with third parties to date
and we may not be able to identify appropriate acquisition or
licensing candidates or to successfully negotiate the terms of
any such transaction. The licensing and acquisition of
pharmaceutical and biological products is a competitive area. A
number of more established companies are also pursuing
strategies to license or acquire products in the pharmaceutical
field, and they may have a competitive advantage over us due to
their size, cash resources and greater clinical development and
commercialization capabilities. If we are unable to successfully
complete acquisitions or in-licensing transactions for suitable
products and product candidates, our prospects for growth could
suffer.
Even if we are successful in completing one or more
acquisitions, the failure to adequately address the financial,
operational or legal risks of these transactions could harm our
business. To finance an acquisition, we could be required to use
our cash resources, issue potentially dilutive equity securities
or incur or assume debt or contingent liabilities. Accounting
for acquisitions can require impairment losses or restructuring
charges, large write-offs of in-process research and development
expense and ongoing amortization expenses related to other
intangible assets. In addition, integrating acquisitions can be
difficult, and could disrupt our business and divert management
resources. If we are unable to manage the integration of any
acquisitions successfully, our ability to develop new products
and continue to expand our product pipeline may be impaired.
We may
need substantial additional funding and be unable to raise
capital when needed, which could force us to delay, reduce or
abandon our commercialization efforts or product development
programs.
We expect to incur significant commercialization expenses for
product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution of
AMITIZA. In addition, we expect our research and development
expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities.
We may need substantial additional funding and be unable to
raise capital when needed
55
or on attractive terms, which would force us to delay, reduce or
abandon our commercialization efforts or development programs.
We have financed our operations and internal growth principally
through private placements of equity securities, payments
received under our collaboration agreement with Takeda and
milestone and other payments from Sucampo AG and R-Tech. We
believe that the net proceeds from this offering, together with
our existing cash and cash equivalents and internally generated
funds that we anticipate from AMITIZA product sales, will be
sufficient to enable us to fund our operating expenses for the
foreseeable future. Our future funding requirements, however,
will depend on many factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
actual levels of AMITIZA product sales;
|
|
|
|
the cost of commercialization activities, including product
marketing, sales and distribution;
|
|
|
|
the scope and results of our research, preclinical and clinical
development activities;
|
|
|
|
the timing of, and the costs involved in, obtaining regulatory
approvals;
|
|
|
|
the costs involved in obtaining and maintaining proprietary
protection for our products, technology and know-how, including
litigation costs and the results of such litigation;
|
|
|
|
our ability to recruit and retain internal staff resources to
conduct these activities;
|
|
|
|
the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products
and technologies;
|
|
|
|
the success of our collaboration with Takeda; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to establish and maintain additional collaborations.
|
If we are required to raise additional funds from external
sources, we might accomplish this through public or private
equity offerings, debt financings or corporate collaboration and
licensing arrangements. If we raise additional funds by issuing
equity securities, you may experience dilution. The holders of
any new equity securities we issue may have rights, preferences
or privileges that are senior to yours. Debt financing, if
available, may involve agreements that include covenants
limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions,
such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures
or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through
collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, it
may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights and related
intellectual property to our technologies, research programs,
products or product candidates.
Risks
Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties, Including Related
Parties
We
have no manufacturing capabilities and are dependent upon R-Tech
to manufacture and supply us with our product and product
candidates. If R-Tech does not manufacture AMITIZA or our other
product candidates in sufficient quantities, at acceptable
quality levels and at acceptable cost and if we are unable to
identify a suitable replacement manufacturer, our sales of
AMITIZA and our further clinical development and
commercialization of other products could be delayed, prevented
or impaired.
We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities and have
little experience in manufacturing pharmaceutical products. We
currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, exclusively on
R-Tech to supply Takeda and us with AMITIZA, SPI-8811 and
SPI-017 and any future prostone compounds that we may determine
to develop or commercialize. We have granted R-Tech the
exclusive right to manufacture and supply AMITIZA to meet our
commercial and clinical requirements in the Americas, Europe,
the Middle East and Africa until 2026, and we do not have an
alternative source of supply for AMITIZA in these or any other
territories. We also do not have an alternative source of supply
for SPI-8811 or SPI-017, which R-Tech manufactures and supplies
to us. If R-Tech is not able to supply AMITIZA or these other
compounds on a timely basis, in sufficient quantities and at
acceptable levels of quality and price and if we are unable to
identify a replacement manufacturer to perform these functions
on acceptable terms, sales of AMITIZA would be significantly
impaired and our development programs could be seriously
jeopardized. In addition, we currently do not have a manufacture
or supply arrangement for the supply of AMITIZA in Asia. Our
ability to market and sell AMITIZA in Asia also would be
significantly impaired if we are
56
unable to enter into a supply and manufacture arrangement with
R-Tech or another suitable manufacturer for the supply of
AMITIZA in that territory.
The risks of relying solely on R-Tech for the manufacture of our
products include:
|
|
|
|
|
we rely solely on R-Tech for quality assurance and their
continued compliance with regulations relating to the
manufacture of pharmaceuticals;
|
|
|
|
R-Techs manufacturing capacity may not be sufficient to
produce commercial quantities of our product, or to keep up with
subsequent increases in the quantities necessary to meet
potentially growing demand;
|
|
|
|
R-Tech may not have access to the capital necessary to expand
its manufacturing facilities in response to our needs;
|
|
|
|
in light of the complexity of the manufacturing process for
prostones, if R-Tech were to cease conducting business, or if
its operations were to be interrupted, it would be difficult and
time consuming for us to find a replacement supplier and the
change would need to be submitted to and approved by the FDA;
|
|
|
|
R-Tech has substantial proprietary know-how relating to the
manufacture of prostones and, in the event we must find a
replacement or supplemental manufacturer or we elect to contract
with another manufacturer to supply us with products other than
AMITIZA, we would need to transfer this know-how to the new
manufacturer, a process that could be both time consuming and
expensive to complete;
|
|
|
|
R-Tech may experience events, such as a fire or natural
disaster, that force it to stop or curtail production for an
extended period; and
|
|
|
|
R-Tech could encounter significant increases in labor, capital
or other costs that would make it difficult for R-Tech to
produce our products cost-effectively.
|
In addition, R-Tech currently uses one supplier for the primary
ingredient used in the manufacture of prostones. R-Tech could
experience delays in production should it become necessary to
switch its source of supply for this ingredient to another
supplier or to manufacture the ingredient itself.
Our current and anticipated future dependence upon R-Tech for
the manufacture of our products and product candidates may
adversely affect our future revenues, our cost structure and our
ability to develop product candidates and commercialize any
approved products on a timely and competitive basis. In
addition, if R-Tech should cease to manufacture prostones for
our clinical trials for any reason, we likely would experience
delays in advancing these trials while we seek to identify and
qualify replacement suppliers. We may be unable to obtain
replacement supplies on a timely basis, on terms that are
favorable to us or at all.
We and
R-Tech are dependent upon a single contract manufacturer to
complete the final stage of manufacture of
AMITIZA.
R-Tech has subcontracted with a single contract manufacturer to
encapsulate the bulk form AMITIZA supplied by R-Tech into
gelatin capsules and to package the final product for
distribution in the United States. If this subcontractor
experiences difficulties or delays in performing these services
for any reason, our ability to deliver adequate supplies of
finished product to physicians and patients will be impaired
during the period in which R-Tech seeks a replacement
manufacturer, which could cause us to lose revenues. In
addition, any change in the party providing encapsulation of
AMITIZA would need to be approved by the FDA, and any change in
the party packaging the product would need to be submitted to
and reviewed by the FDA, which could increase the time required
to replace this subcontractor should that become necessary.
R-Tech
and any other third-party manufacturer of our products and
product candidates are subject to significant regulations
governing manufacturing facilities and procedures.
R-Tech, R-Techs subcontractors and suppliers and any other
potential manufacturer of our products or product candidates may
not be able to comply with the FDAs current good
manufacturing practice, or cGMP, regulations, other
U.S. regulations or similar regulatory requirements in
force outside the United States. These regulations govern
manufacturing processes and procedures and the implementation
and operation of systems to
57
control and assure the quality of products approved for sale. In
addition, the FDA or other regulatory agencies outside the
United States may at any time audit or inspect a manufacturing
facility to ensure compliance with cGMP or similar regulations.
Our failure, or the failure of R-Tech, R-Techs
subcontractors and suppliers or any other third-party
manufacturer we use, to comply with applicable manufacturing
regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us,
including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, failure of
regulatory authorities to grant marketing approval of our
product candidates, delays, suspension or withdrawal of
approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product
candidates or products, operating restrictions and criminal
prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely
affect supplies of our products and product candidates.
If it were to become necessary for us to replace R-Tech as
contract manufacturer of our product and product candidates, we
would compete with other products for access to appropriate
manufacturing facilities and the change would need to be
submitted to and approved by the FDA. Among manufacturers that
operate under cGMP regulations, there are a limited number that
would be both capable of manufacturing for us and willing to do
so.
We
depend significantly on our collaboration with Takeda, and may
depend in the future on collaborations with other third parties,
to develop and commercialize our product
candidates.
A key element of our business strategy is to collaborate where
appropriate with third parties, particularly leading
pharmaceutical companies, to develop, commercialize and market
our products and product candidates. We are currently party to a
16-year
joint collaboration and license agreement with Takeda for the
development and commercialization of AMITIZA for
gastrointestinal indications in the United States and Canada.
Our agreement with Takeda provides that it may be terminated by
either party if we fail to receive marketing approval from the
FDA for AMITIZA for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome
with constipation and if we and Takeda do not thereafter agree
on an alternative development and commercialization strategy. If
Takeda were to terminate the agreement under these conditions,
we would likely realize significantly lower revenues from sales
of AMITIZA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation
until we could find a replacement marketing organization or
develop our own, and our ability to continue our development
program for AMITIZA for other gastrointestinal indications could
be seriously compromised. In addition, if we fail to receive
marketing approval from the FDA for this indication, we might
not receive up to $30.0 million of development milestone
payments that Takeda is obligated to pay us upon our achievement
of future regulatory milestones relating to AMITIZA. We also
might not receive up to $50.0 million of commercial
milestone payments that Takeda is obligated to pay us upon the
achievement of specified targets for annual net sales revenue
from AMITIZA in the United States and Canada.
The success of our collaboration arrangement will depend heavily
on the efforts and activities of Takeda. The risks that we face
in connection with this collaboration, and that we anticipate
being subject to in any future collaborations, include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
our joint collaboration agreement with Takeda is, and any future
collaboration agreements that we may enter into are likely to
be, subject to termination under various circumstances;
|
|
|
|
Takeda and other future collaborators may develop and
commercialize, either alone or with others, products and
services that are similar to or competitive with the products
that are the subject of the collaboration with us;
|
|
|
|
Takeda and other future collaborators may underfund or not
commit sufficient resources to the testing, marketing,
distribution or other development of our products or may use
committed resources inefficiently;
|
|
|
|
Takeda and other future collaborators may not properly maintain
or defend our intellectual property rights or may utilize our
proprietary information in such a way as to invite litigation
that could jeopardize or invalidate our proprietary information
or expose us to potential liability; and
|
|
|
|
Takeda and other future collaborators may change the focus of
their development and commercialization efforts. Pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies historically have re-evaluated their
priorities from time to time, including following mergers and
consolidations, which have been common in recent years in these
industries.
|
58
The ability of our products and product candidates to reach
their potential could be limited if Takeda or any other future
collaborators decrease or fail to increase spending relating to
such products, fail to dedicate sufficient resources to
promoting our products or change their business focus.
Because
we rely upon third parties to provide the sales representatives
marketing AMITIZA, we may face increased risks arising from
their misconduct or improper activities, which would harm our
business.
Because we will have only limited capacity to monitor the sales
efforts of Takedas sales force, we may be exposed to
increased risks arising from any misconduct or improper
activities of these sales representatives, including the
potential off-label promotion of our products or their failure
to adhere to standard requirements in connection with product
promotion. In addition, we will be exposed to similar risks
arising from our previous use of Ventivs employees to
market AMITIZA. Although we terminated our agreement with Ventiv
effective July 1, 2007, any misconduct or inappropriate
activities by Ventiv employees prior to termination could create
future liabilities for us, and any misconduct or inappropriate
activities might not come to light for an extended period after
the termination. Any such improper activities could hurt our
reputation, cause us to become subject to significant
liabilities and otherwise harm our business.
We may
not be successful in establishing additional collaborations,
which could compromise our ability to develop and commercialize
products.
If we are unable to reach new agreements with suitable
collaborators, we may fail to meet our business objectives for
the affected product or program. We face significant competition
in seeking appropriate collaborators. Moreover, these
collaboration arrangements are complex and time-consuming to
negotiate and document. We may not be successful in our efforts
to establish additional collaborations or other alternative
arrangements. The terms of any additional collaborations or
other arrangements that we establish may not be as favorable to
us as we anticipate. Moreover, these collaborations or other
arrangements may not be successful.
We
rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials and those
third parties may not perform satisfactorily or may fail to meet
established deadlines for the completion of these
trials.
We generally do not have the independent ability to conduct
clinical trials for our product candidates. We rely on third
parties, such as contract research organizations, clinical data
management organizations, medical institutions, and clinical
investigators, to perform this function. For example,
approximately 130 separate clinical investigators participated
in our trials for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. We
use multiple contract research organizations to coordinate the
efforts of our clinical investigators and to accumulate the
results of our trials. Our reliance on these third parties for
clinical development activities reduces our control over these
activities. Furthermore, these third parties may also have
relationships with other entities, some of which may be our
competitors. If these third parties do not carry out their
contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we will be
delayed in obtaining, or may not be able to obtain, regulatory
approvals for our product candidates and will be delayed in our
efforts to, or may not be able to, successfully commercialize
our product candidates.
In addition, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our
clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the general
investigational plan and protocols for the trial. The FDA
requires us to comply with standards, commonly referred to as
good clinical practices, for conducting and recording and
reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and
reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights,
integrity and confidentiality of trial participants are
protected. Our reliance on third parties that we do not control
does not relieve us of these responsibilities and requirements.
Conflicts
of interest may arise between us and Sucampo AG or R-Tech, and
these conflicts might ultimately be resolved in a manner
unfavorable to us.
Our founders, Dr. Sachiko Kuno and Dr. Ryuji Ueno,
together wholly own Sucampo AG and own a majority of the stock
of R-Tech. Dr. Kuno and Dr. Ueno are married to each
other. Ownership interests of our founders in the stock of
R-Tech or Sucampo AG, and Dr. Uenos service as a
director and executive officer of our company, could give rise
to conflicts of interest when faced with a decision that could
favor the interests of one of the affiliated
59
companies over another. In addition, conflicts of interest may
arise with respect to existing or possible future commercial
arrangements between us and R-Tech or Sucampo AG in which the
terms and conditions of the arrangements are subject to
negotiation or dispute. For example, conflicts of interest could
arise over matters such as:
|
|
|
|
|
disputes over the cost or quality of the manufacturing services
provided to us by R-Tech with respect to AMITIZA, SPI-8811 and
SPI-017;
|
|
|
|
a decision whether to engage R-Tech in the future to manufacture
and supply compounds other than AMITIZA, SPI-8811 and SPI-017;
|
|
|
|
decisions as to which particular prostone compounds, other than
AMITIZA, SPI-8811 or SPI-017, we will commit sufficient
development efforts to so that commercial rights to those
compounds will not revert back to Sucampo AG at the end of the
specified period; or
|
|
|
|
business opportunities unrelated to prostones that may be
attractive both to us and to the other company.
|
If
United States or foreign tax authorities disagree with our
transfer pricing policies, we could become subject to
significant tax liabilities.
We are a member of an affiliated group of entities, including
Sucampo AG and R-Tech, each of which is directly or indirectly
controlled by Drs. Kuno and Ueno. We have had and will
continue to have significant commercial transactions with these
entities. Furthermore, we operate two foreign subsidiaries,
Sucampo Japan and Sucampo Europe. We expect to enter into
commercial transactions with each of these entities on an
ongoing basis. As a result of these transactions, we will be
subject to complex transfer pricing regulations in both the
United States and the other countries in which we and our
affiliates operate. Transfer pricing regulations generally
require that, for tax purposes, transactions between our
subsidiaries and affiliates and us be priced on a basis that
would be comparable to an arms length transaction and that
contemporaneous documentation be maintained to support the
related party agreements. To the extent that United States or
any foreign tax authorities disagree with our transfer pricing
policies, we could become subject to significant tax liabilities
and penalties related to prior, existing and future related
party agreements.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property
If we
are unable to obtain and maintain proprietary protection for the
intellectual property relating to our technology and products,
the value of our technology and products will be adversely
affected and our ability to derive revenue from our products
would be impaired.
Our success depends in part on our ability, and that of Sucampo
AG, to obtain and maintain proprietary protection for the
technology and know-how upon which our products are based, to
operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others
and to prevent others from infringing on our proprietary rights.
The patent positions of companies like ours are generally
uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. Our
ability to maintain and solidify our proprietary position for
our intellectual property will depend on our success, in
conjunction with Sucampo AG, in obtaining effective claims and
enforcing those claims once granted. The scope of protection
afforded by a set of patent claims is subject to inherent
uncertainty unless the patent has already been litigated and a
court has ruled on the meaning of the claim language and other
issues affecting how broadly a patent claim can be enforced. In
some cases, we license patent applications from Sucampo AG
instead of issued patents, and we do not know whether these
patent applications will result in the issuance of any patents.
Our licensed patents may be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented, which could limit the term of patent protection
for our products or diminish our ability to stop competitors
from marketing related products. In addition, changes in either
patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United
States and other countries may diminish the value of Sucampo
AGs patents and our intellectual property or narrow the
scope of the protection provided by these patents. Accordingly,
we cannot determine the degree of future protection for our
proprietary rights in the licensed patents and patent
applications. Furthermore, because of the extensive time
required for development, testing and regulatory review of a
potential product, it is possible that, before any of our
product candidates can be
60
commercialized, a related patent may expire or may remain in
force for only a short period following commercialization,
thereby reducing any advantage of the patent.
The patents we license from Sucampo AG also may not afford us
protection against competitors with similar technology. Because
patent applications in the United States and many foreign
jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months
after filing, or in some cases not at all, and because
publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often
lag behind actual discoveries, neither we nor our Sucampo AG can
be certain that we or they were the first to make the inventions
claimed in issued patents or pending patent applications, or
that we or they were the first to file for protection of the
inventions set forth in these patent applications.
Confidentiality
agreements with our employees and other precautions may not be
adequate to prevent disclosure of our proprietary information
and know-how.
In addition to patented technology, we rely upon unpatented
proprietary technology, processes and know-how developed both by
Sucampo AG and by us. We and Sucampo AG seek to protect our
respective proprietary technology and processes, in part, by
confidentiality agreements with our respective employees,
consultants, scientific advisors and contractors. We also seek
to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and
trade secrets by maintaining physical security of our premises
and physical and electronic security of our information
technology systems. These agreements or security measures may be
breached, and we and Sucampo AG may not have adequate remedies
for any such breach. In addition, our trade secrets may
otherwise become known or be independently developed by
competitors. If we or Sucampo AG are unable to protect the
confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how,
competitors may be able to use this information to develop
products that compete with our products, which could compromise
our ability to produce revenue and achieve profitability.
If we
infringe or are alleged to infringe intellectual property rights
of third parties, our business could be harmed.
There has been substantial litigation and other proceedings
regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Our research,
development and commercialization activities and those of
Sucampo AG, as well as any products or product candidates
resulting from these activities, may infringe or be alleged to
infringe patents or patent applications owned or controlled by
other parties. These third parties could bring claims against us
or one of our collaborators that would require us to incur
substantial expenses and, if successful against us, could cause
us to pay substantial damages. Further, if a patent infringement
suit were brought against us or one of our collaborators, we or
they could be forced to stop or delay research, development,
manufacturing or sales of the product or product candidate that
is the subject of the suit.
As a result of patent infringement claims, or in order to avoid
potential claims, we or one of our collaborators may choose or
be required to seek a license from a third party and be required
to pay license fees or royalties or both. These licenses may not
be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we or a
collaborator were able to obtain a license, the rights may be
nonexclusive, which could result in our competitors gaining
access to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, we could
be prevented from commercializing a product, or be forced to
cease some aspect of our business operations, if, as a result of
actual or threatened patent infringement claims, we or one of
our collaborators are unable to enter into licenses on
acceptable terms. This could harm our business significantly.
We may
be subject to other patent related litigation or proceedings
that could be costly to defend and uncertain in their
outcome.
In addition to infringement claims against us, we may become a
party to other patent litigation and proceedings, including
interference proceedings declared by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office or opposition proceedings in the European
Patent Office regarding intellectual property rights with
respect to our products and technology, as well as other
disputes with licensees, licensors or others with whom we have
contractual or other business relationships for intellectual
property. The cost to us of any patent litigation or other
proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial.
Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such
litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because
of their substantially greater financial
61
resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and
continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could
negatively affect our ability to compete in the marketplace.
Patent litigation and other proceedings may also absorb
significant management resources.
Risks
Related to Regulatory Approval and Oversight
If we
are not able to obtain required regulatory approvals, we will
not be able to commercialize our product candidates and our
ability to generate revenue will be materially
impaired.
Our product candidates and the activities associated with their
development and commercialization, including testing,
manufacture, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping, labeling, storage,
approval, advertising, promotion, sale and distribution, are
subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and other
regulatory agencies in the United States and by authorities in
other countries. Failure to obtain regulatory approval for a
product candidate will prevent us from commercializing the
product candidate.
Securing FDA approval requires the submission of extensive
preclinical and clinical data, information about product
manufacturing processes and inspection of facilities and
supporting information to the FDA for each therapeutic
indication to establish the product candidates safety and
efficacy. Our future products may not be effective, may be only
moderately effective or may prove to have undesirable side
effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude
our obtaining regulatory approval or prevent or limit commercial
use.
The process of obtaining regulatory approvals is expensive,
often takes many years, if approval is obtained at all, and can
vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty
of the product candidates involved. Changes in the regulatory
approval policy during the development period, changes in or the
enactment of additional statutes or regulations, or changes in
regulatory review for each submitted product application, may
cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. The
FDA has substantial discretion in the approval process and may
refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data are
insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical,
clinical or other studies. In addition, varying interpretations
of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could
delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval of a product
candidate. Any regulatory approval we ultimately obtain may be
limited in scope or subject to restrictions or post-approval
commitments that render the product not commercially viable. If
any regulatory approval that we obtain is delayed or is limited,
we may decide not to commercialize the product candidate after
receiving the approval.
Even
if we receive regulatory approval for a product, the product
could be subject to regulatory restrictions or withdrawal from
the market, and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to
comply with ongoing regulatory requirements.
AMITIZA and any other product for which we obtain marketing
approval, along with the manufacturing processes, post-approval
clinical data, labeling, advertising and promotional activities
for such product, will be subject to continual requirements of
and review by the FDA and other regulatory bodies. These
requirements include submissions of safety and other
post-marketing information and reports, registration
requirements, cGMP requirements relating to quality control,
quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and
documents, requirements regarding the distribution of samples to
physicians and recordkeeping. Even if regulatory approval of a
product is granted, the approval may be subject to limitations
on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or
to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for
costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the
safety or efficacy of the product. If we fail to comply with
applicable regulatory requirements, we may be subject to fines,
suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product
recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and
criminal prosecution.
We may
experience unanticipated safety issues with our products after
they are approved for marketing, which could harm our business
and our reputation.
Because AMITIZA and our other product candidates are based on
newly discovered prostone technology with novel mechanisms of
action, there may be long-term safety risks associated with
these products that are not
62
identifiable or well-understood at early stages of development
and commercialization. Later discovery of previously unknown
problems with our products, manufacturers or manufacturing
processes may result in:
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions on such products, manufacturers or manufacturing
processes;
|
|
|
|
warning letters;
|
|
|
|
withdrawal of the products from the market;
|
|
|
|
refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to
approved applications that we submit; and
|
|
|
|
voluntary or mandatory product recalls.
|
Because we rely on Takeda to provide a significant portion of
the sales force that is selling AMITIZA, we are dependent to
some degree on Takeda to promptly and properly report any safety
issues encountered in the field. If Takeda or their sales
representatives fail to provide timely and accurate reporting of
any safety issues that arise in connection with AMITIZA, our
business and reputation could be harmed.
Failure
to obtain regulatory approval in international jurisdictions
would prevent us from marketing our products outside the United
States and could adversely affect our reputation and our product
marketing activities within the United States.
We intend to market our products both domestically and outside
the United States. In order to market our products in the
European Union, Japan and many other foreign jurisdictions, we
must obtain separate regulatory approvals and comply with
numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval
procedure varies among countries and can involve additional
testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ from
that required to obtain FDA approval. The foreign regulatory
approval process may include all of the risks associated with
obtaining FDA approval. We may not obtain foreign regulatory
approvals on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does
not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries
or jurisdictions, and approval by one foreign regulatory
authority does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in
other foreign countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. We may
not be able to file for regulatory approvals and may not receive
necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market.
We may
not be able to obtain orphan drug exclusivity for our product
candidates. If our competitors are able to obtain orphan drug
exclusivity for a product that is competitive with one or more
of our product candidates and we cannot show that our product
candidate is clinically superior, we may not be able to have
competing products approved by the applicable regulatory
authority for a significant period of time.
Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including Europe
and the United States, may designate drugs that target
relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. We have
received an orphan drug designation from the FDA for our product
candidate SPI-8811 for the treatment of disorders associated
with cystic fibrosis and we may pursue orphan drug designation
for additional product candidates. Generally, if a product with
an orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first
marketing approval for the indication for which it has such
designation, the product is entitled to a period of marketing
exclusivity. The exclusivity applies only to the indication for
which the drug has been designated and approved. The applicable
exclusivity period is seven years in the United States, but this
period may be interrupted if a sponsor of a competitive product
that is otherwise the same drug for the same use can show that
its drug is clinically superior to our orphan drug candidate.
The European exclusivity period is ten years, but may be reduced
to six years if a drug no longer meets the criteria for orphan
drug designation, including where it is shown that the drug is
sufficiently profitable so that market exclusivity is no longer
justified. In addition, European regulations establish that a
competitors marketing authorization for a similar product
with the same indication may be granted if there is an
insufficient supply of the product or if another applicant can
establish that its product is safer, more effective or otherwise
clinically superior. If a competitor obtains orphan drug
exclusivity for a product competitive with SPI-8811 before we do
and if the competitors product is the same drug with the
same indication as ours, we would be excluded from the market,
unless we can show that our drug is safer, more effective or
otherwise clinically superior. Even if we obtain orphan drug
exclusivity for SPI-8811 for these indications, we may not be
able to maintain it if a competitor with a product that is
otherwise the same drug can establish that its product is
clinically superior.
63
We
must comply with federal, state and foreign laws, regulations,
and other rules relating to the health care business, and, if we
are unable to fully comply with such laws, regulations and other
rules, we could face substantial penalties.
We are or will be directly, or indirectly through our customers,
subject to extensive regulation by the federal government, the
states and foreign countries in which we may conduct our
business. The laws that directly or indirectly affect our
ability to operate our business include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the federal Medicare and Medicaid Anti-Kickback law, which
prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting,
offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or
indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce either the referral of
an individual, or furnishing or arranging for a good or service,
for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs
such as the Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
|
|
|
|
other Medicare laws, regulations, rules, manual provisions and
policies that prescribe the requirements for coverage and
payment for services performed by our customers, including the
amount of such payment;
|
|
|
|
the federal False Claims Act, which imposes civil and criminal
liability on individuals and entities who submit, or cause to be
submitted, false or fraudulent claims for payment to the
government;
|
|
|
|
the federal False Statements Act, which prohibits knowingly and
willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact
or making any materially false statement in connection with the
delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or
services; and
|
|
|
|
state and foreign law equivalents of the foregoing and state
laws regarding pharmaceutical company marketing compliance,
reporting and disclosure obligations.
|
If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the
laws, regulations, rules or policies described above or any
other law or governmental regulation to which we or our
customers are or will be subject, or if the interpretation of
the foregoing changes, we may be subject to civil and criminal
penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from the Medicare and
Medicaid programs and the curtailment or restructuring of our
operations. Similarly, if our customers are found non-compliant
with applicable laws, they may be subject to sanctions, which
could also have a negative impact on us. Any penalties, damages,
fines, curtailment or restructuring of our operations would harm
our ability to operate our business and our financial results.
The risk of our being found in violation of these laws is
increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully
interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and
their provisions may be open to a variety of interpretations.
Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we
successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur
significant legal expenses, divert management resources from the
operation of our business and damage our reputation.
Other
Risks
Our
founders maintain the ability to control all matters submitted
to stockholders for approval, which could result in actions of
which you or other stockholders do not approve.
Dr. Sachiko Kuno, who was until recently an executive
officer and director of our company, and Dr. Ryuji Ueno,
our chief executive officer, chief scientific officer and a
director, together beneficially own 2,426,385 shares of
class A common stock and 26,191,050 shares of
class B common stock, representing approximately 95% of the
combined voting power of our outstanding common stock. As a
result, Drs. Kuno and Ueno, who are married, acting by
themselves will be able to control the outcome of all matters
that our stockholders vote upon, including the election of
directors, amendments to our certificate of incorporation, and
mergers or other business combinations. The concentration of
ownership and voting power also may have the effect of delaying
or preventing a change in control of our company and could
prevent stockholders from receiving a premium over the market
price if a change in control is proposed.
64
Provisions
in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law may
prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to change our
management and hinder efforts to acquire a controlling interest
in us, and the market price of our class A common stock may
be lower as a result.
There are provisions in our certificate of incorporation and
by-laws that may make it difficult for a third party to acquire,
or attempt to acquire, control of our company, even if a change
in control was considered favorable by you and other
stockholders. For example, our board of directors has the
authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred
stock. The board of directors can fix the price, rights,
preferences, privileges, and restrictions of the preferred stock
without any further vote or action by our stockholders. The
issuance of shares of preferred stock may delay or prevent a
change in control transaction. As a result, the market price of
our class A common stock and the voting and other rights of
our stockholders may be adversely affected. An issuance of
shares of preferred stock may result in the loss of voting
control to other stockholders.
Our charter documents contain other provisions that could have
an anti-takeover effect, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the high-vote nature of our class B common stock;
|
|
|
|
following the conversion of all shares of class B common
stock into class A common stock, only one of our three
classes of directors will be elected each year;
|
|
|
|
following the conversion of all shares of class B common
stock into class A common stock, stockholders will not be
entitled to remove directors other than by a 75% vote and for
cause;
|
|
|
|
following the conversion of all shares of class B common
stock into class A common stock, stockholders will not be
permitted to take actions by written consent;
|
|
|
|
stockholders cannot call a special meeting of
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
stockholders must give advance notice to nominate directors or
submit proposals for consideration at stockholder meetings.
|
In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which
regulates corporate acquisitions. These provisions could
discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or
prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have
the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for
our class A common stock. These provisions may also prevent
changes in our management.
Our
stock price may be volatile and purchasers of our class A
common stock could incur substantial losses.
Our stock price is likely to be volatile. The stock market in
general and the market for pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that
has often been unrelated to the operating performance of
particular companies. As a result of this volatility, investors
may not be able to sell their class A common stock at or
above the initial public offering price. The market price for
our class A common stock may be influenced by many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
failure of AMITIZA or other approved products, if any, to
achieve commercial success;
|
|
|
|
results of clinical trials of our product candidates or those of
our competitors;
|
|
|
|
the regulatory status of our product candidates;
|
|
|
|
the success of competitive products or technologies;
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments in the United States and foreign
countries;
|
|
|
|
developments or disputes concerning patents or other proprietary
rights;
|
|
|
|
the ability of R-Tech to manufacture our products to commercial
standards in sufficient quantities;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial
results;
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
variations in the financial results of companies that are
perceived to be similar to us;
|
|
|
|
changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;
|
|
|
|
market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology
sectors and issuance of new or changed securities analysts
reports or recommendations; and
|
|
|
|
general economic, industry and market conditions.
|
We
have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock, and we do
not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future.
We have paid no cash dividends on our capital stock to date. We
currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund
the development and growth of our business. In addition, the
terms of any existing or future debt agreements may preclude us
from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if
any, of our class A common stock will be your sole source
of gain for the foreseeable future.
A
significant portion of our total outstanding shares are eligible
to be sold into the market in the near future. This could cause
the market price of our class A common stock to drop
significantly, even if our business is doing well.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our class A
common stock in the public market could occur at any time. If
our stockholders sell, or the market perceives that our
stockholders intend to sell, substantial amounts of our
class A common stock in the public market following this
offering, the market price of our class A common stock
could decline significantly. We have outstanding
41,729,568 shares of common stock, assuming no exercise of
outstanding options. Of these shares, the 3,750,000 shares
sold in our recent initial public offering are freely tradable
and 37,544,011 additional shares of common stock will become
available for sale in the public market in February 2008
following the expiration of
lock-up
agreements between our stockholders and the underwriters,
subject in some cases to volume limitations imposed by federal
securities laws. The representatives of the underwriters may
release these stockholders from their
180-day
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters at any time and without notice,
which would allow for earlier sales of shares in the public
market. Moreover, holders of an aggregate of
6,751,609 shares of our common stock have rights, subject
to some conditions, to require us to file registration
statements covering their shares or to include their shares in
registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other
stockholders. We also intend to register the
13,900,900 shares of class A common stock that we may
issue in the future under our equity compensation plans. Once we
register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public
market upon issuance, subject to the
180-day
lock-up
agreements with our underwriters.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
Use of
Proceeds from Initial Public Offering of Class A Common
Stock
In August 2007, we completed an initial public offering of
class A common stock pursuant to a Registration Statement
on
Form S-1
(Registration
No. 333-135133)
which the SEC declared effective on August 2, 2007.
Pursuant to the registration statement, we registered the
offering and sale of an aggregate of 4,312,500 shares of
our class A common stock, of which 3,125,000 shares
were sold by us and 625,000 shares were sold by a selling
stockholder, at a price of $11.50 per share. S&R Technology
Holdings, LLC, which is wholly-owned by Drs. Kuno and Ueno,
granted to the underwriters an option to purchase an additional
562,500 shares of our class A common stock at the
initial public offering price of $11.50 per share to cover
over-allotments, if any. The initial closing of the offering
occurred on August 2, 2007. The underwriters have not yet
exercised their over-allotment option. The managing underwriters
for the offering were Cowen and Company, LLC, CIBC World Markets
Corp. and Leerink Swann & Co., Inc.
We raised a total of $35.9 million in gross proceeds from
the initial public offering, or approximately $28.4 million
in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions of $2.5 million and other estimated offering
expenses of approximately $5.0 million. The selling
stockholder received a total of
66
approximately $7.2 million in gross proceeds from the
initial public offering, or approximately $6.7 million of
net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discounts.
We have not used any of the net proceeds from the offering to
make payments, directly or indirectly, to any director or
officer of ours, or any of their associates, to any person
owning 10% or more of our common stock or to any affiliate of
ours, and none of the expenses we incurred in connection with
the offering or the underwriting discounts and commissions were
paid, directly or indirectly, to any such persons.
We have invested the net proceeds from the offering in
short-term, investment grade, interest-bearing instruments.
There has been no material change in our planned use of the
balance of the net proceeds from the offering as described in
our final prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to
Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
We held our annual meeting of stockholders on June 26,
2007. The following matters were voted upon at the annual
meeting:
|
|
|
|
Matter 1:
|
To elect five directors to serve until the 2008 annual meeting
of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and
qualified.
|
|
|
Matter 2:
|
To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2007.
|
A summary of the voting for each director nominee and other
matters voted upon at the annual meeting is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee/Matter
|
|
For
|
|
|
Against or Withheld
|
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
Ryuji
Ueno, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
32,188,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Jeffries
|
|
|
32,188,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy I. Maudlin
|
|
|
32,188,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidetoshi Mine
|
|
|
32,188,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Sue Molina
|
|
|
32,188,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matter 2
|
|
|
32,188,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
67
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2007
|
|
By: /s/ Ryuji Ueno
Ryuji
Ueno, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and
Chair of the Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2007
|
|
By: /s/ Ronald W. Kaiser
Ronald
W. Kaiser
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2007
|
|
By: /s/ Mariam E. Morris
Mariam
E. Morris
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
68
Sucampo
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
69
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Ryuji Ueno, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
[paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC Release 34-47986]; |
|
|
(c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
(b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 21, 2007 |
/s/ RYUJI UENO
|
|
|
Ryuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D. |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Ronald W. Kaiser, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
[paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC Release 34-47986]; |
|
|
(c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
(b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 21, 2007 |
/s/ RONALD W. KAISER
|
|
|
Ronald W. Kaiser |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sucampo Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the Company) certifies to the best of his knowledge that:
|
(1) |
|
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 21, 2007 |
/s/ RYUJI UENO
|
|
|
Ryuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D. |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Sucampo Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the Company) certifies to the best of his knowledge that:
|
(1) |
|
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 21, 2007 |
/s/ RONALD W. KAISER
|
|
|
Ronald W. Kaiser |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|